Zainab Begum vs The State of Telangana Advocate - GP FOR REVENUE — HBHC10391622026

Disposed: OFFICE OBJECTION SUSTAINED on 19th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HBHC010391622026

Filing Number

WA/28348/2026

Filing Date

18-Jun-2026

Judge

Aparesh Kumar Singh , G.M. Mohiuddin

Coram

Aparesh Kumar Singh , G.M. Mohiuddin

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

WA ( 27 )

Sub-Category

REVENUE ( 37 )

Judicial Branch

WRIT Section

Decision Date

19-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

OFFICE OBJECTION SUSTAINED

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Zainab Begum

    Adv. N SREEDHAR REDDY

  2. 2.Lateefunnisa Begum

  3. 3.Syeda Khairunissa

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of Telangana Advocate - GP FOR REVENUE

  2. 2.District Collector

  3. 3.The Joint Collector/Addl. Collector

  4. 4.Revenue Divisional Officer

  5. 5.The Tahsildar

  6. 6.M/s Novus Real Estate Private Limited

  7. 7.Ramesh Kumar Dalmia

  8. 8.Mrs Chaparala Padma Sree

  9. 9.Mrs Movva Sarojini

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 19-Jun-2026

    Aparesh Kumar Singh,g.m. MohiuddinView PDF

    The High Court of Telangana rejected the writ appeal filed by petitioners Zainab Begum, Lateefunnisa Begum, and Syeda Khairunissa as not maintainable. The court sustained the Registry's objections that the appeal was premature (filed while the original writ petition was still at admission stage) and that the petitioners had alternative remedies available. The court dismissed the appeal and directed return of papers to the petitioners' counsel. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 19-Jun-2026

    For Orders Of Court

    Aparesh Kumar Singh , G.M. Mohiuddin

  4. 18-Jun-2026

    Case filed

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Telangana rejected the writ appeal filed by petitioners Zainab Begum, Lateefunnisa Begum, and Syeda Khairunissa as not maintainable. The court sustained the Registry's objections that the appeal was premature (filed while the original writ petition was still at admission stage) and that the petitioners had alternative remedies available. The court dismissed the appeal and directed return of papers to the petitioners' counsel. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case