Bhupati Venkateshwara Rao vs V. P. Gautham Advocate - GP FOR SERVICES III — CC/1697/2025
Case under Contempt of Courts Act Section 10to12. Next hearing: 19th June 2026.
CNR: HBHC010386582025
Filing Number
CC/28741/2025
Filing Date
07-Jul-2025
Registration No
CC/1697/2025
Registration Date
16-Jul-2025
Judge
Pulla Karthik
Coram
Pulla Karthik
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CC ( 2 )
Sub-Category
HOUSING BOARD ( 21 )
Judicial Branch
OS Section
Last updated 12-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Bhupati Venkateshwara Rao
Adv. M V RAMA RAO
Respondent(s)
-
1.V. P. Gautham Advocate - GP FOR SERVICES III
Case History
-
19-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
19-Jun-2026
For Compliance
Pulla Karthik
-
24-Apr-2026
Pulla KarthikView PDF
-
24-Apr-2026
Pulla KarthikView PDF
Summary The High Court for Telangana (Justice Pulla Karthik) adjourned the contempt case to June 19, 2026 for reporting compliance with a previous order dated December 31, 2024. The respondent (V. P. Gautham, Principal Secretary) is directed to appear in person on the next hearing date if compliance is not reported. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Apr-2026
Pulla KarthikView PDF
-
20-Mar-2026
Admission
Pulla Karthik
-
06-Mar-2026
Pulla KarthikView PDF
-
06-Mar-2026
Admission
Pulla Karthik
-
27-Feb-2026
Pulla KarthikView PDF
-
27-Feb-2026
Admission
Pulla Karthik
-
30-Jan-2026
Pulla KarthikView PDF
-
12-Sep-2025
Admission
Pulla Karthik
-
29-Aug-2025
Pulla KarthikView PDF
-
29-Aug-2025
Admission
Pulla Karthik
-
22-Aug-2025
For Admission
Pulla Karthik
-
25-Jul-2025
Pulla KarthikView PDF
-
25-Jul-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
07-Jul-2025
Case filed
Registration No. CC/1697/2025
Summary The High Court for Telangana (Justice Pulla Karthik) adjourned the contempt case to June 19, 2026 for reporting compliance with a previous order dated December 31, 2024. The respondent (V. P. Gautham, Principal Secretary) is directed to appear in person on the next hearing date if compliance is not reported. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts