GANDU RAJESH KUMAR vs State of Telangana Advocate - GP FOR HOME — WP/18664/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: 24th June 2026.

Next hearing 24-Jun-2026

CNR: HBHC010384972026

Filing Number

WP/27875/2026

Filing Date

16-Jun-2026

Registration No

WP/18664/2026

Registration Date

16-Jun-2026

Judge

Moushumi Bhattacharya , Gadi Praveen Kumar

Coram

Moushumi Bhattacharya , Gadi Praveen Kumar

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

WP ( 28 )

Sub-Category

HABEAS CORPUS ( 21 )

Judicial Branch

WRIT Section

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GANDU RAJESH KUMAR

    Adv. R GOPI MOHAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Telangana Advocate - GP FOR HOME

  2. 2.The Commissioner of Police

  3. 3.The Deputy Commissioner of Police

  4. 4.The Assistant Commissioner of Police

  5. 5.The Station House Officer

  6. 6.G Nagamani

  7. 7.Amaram C Chandra Sekhar

Case History

  1. 24-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 24-Jun-2026

    For Admission

    Moushumi Bhattacharya , Gadi Praveen Kumar

  3. 19-Jun-2026

    Moushumi Bhattacharya,gadi Praveen KumarView PDF

    Summary: In WP No. 18664/2026, the Telangana High Court heard arguments from petitioner Gandu Rajesh Kumar's counsel and the Government Pleader on 19.06.2026. The Court adjourned the matter and scheduled it for 23.06.2026 with directions to the Government Pleader to file written instructions regarding the respondents' position. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 19-Jun-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 16-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/18664/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In WP No. 18664/2026, the Telangana High Court heard arguments from petitioner Gandu Rajesh Kumar's counsel and the Government Pleader on 19.06.2026. The Court adjourned the matter and scheduled it for 23.06.2026 with directions to the Government Pleader to file written instructions regarding the respondents' position. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case