Mohd. Ahmed Ansari vs The State of Telangana Advocate - GP FOR HIGHER EDUCATION — WP/18759/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF NO COSTS on 18th June 2026.
CNR: HBHC010384502026
Filing Number
WP/27840/2026
Filing Date
16-Jun-2026
Registration No
WP/18759/2026
Registration Date
17-Jun-2026
Judge
Juvvadi Sridevi
Coram
Juvvadi Sridevi
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
WP ( 28 )
Sub-Category
ISSUE OF CERTIFICATE ( 35 )
Judicial Branch
WRIT Section
Decision Date
18-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OF NO COSTS
Last updated 19-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Mohd. Ahmed Ansari
Adv. MOHD ISLAMUDDIN ANSARI
Respondent(s)
-
1.The State of Telangana Advocate - GP FOR HIGHER EDUCATION
-
2.Nawab Shah Alam Khan College of Engineering and Technology
-
3.The Principal
-
4.State Board of Technical Education and Training Telangana
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
18-Jun-2026
Juvvadi SrideviView PDF
Case Summary: WP 18759/2026 Decision: The High Court of Telangana allowed the writ petition, directing Nawab Shah Alam Khan College of Engineering and Technology to forthwith return the petitioner's original certificates (CBSE, Transfer, and Bonafide certificates). Key Reasoning: The court held that the college had no authority to retain the petitioner's personal academic credentials as security for alleged unpaid fees. Even if monetary claims exist, withholding certificates is an illegal enforcement method; the college's proper remedy is legal recovery proceedings, not certificate detention. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Jun-2026
Admission (Education )
Juvvadi Sridevi
-
16-Jun-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/18759/2026
Case Summary: WP 18759/2026 Decision: The High Court of Telangana allowed the writ petition, directing Nawab Shah Alam Khan College of Engineering and Technology to forthwith return the petitioner's original certificates (CBSE, Transfer, and Bonafide certificates). Key Reasoning: The court held that the college had no authority to retain the petitioner's personal academic credentials as security for alleged unpaid fees. Even if monetary claims exist, withholding certificates is an illegal enforcement method; the college's proper remedy is legal recovery proceedings, not certificate detention. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts