Mrs. Vuppala Shobha Rani vs The Union of India, Advocate - N BHUJANGA RAO Deputy Solicitor General of India — WP/18597/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF NO COSTS on 17th June 2026.
CNR: HBHC010381642026
Filing Number
WP/27632/2026
Filing Date
15-Jun-2026
Registration No
WP/18597/2026
Registration Date
16-Jun-2026
Judge
B.Vijaysen Reddy
Coram
B.Vijaysen Reddy
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
WP ( 28 )
Sub-Category
PASSPORT OFFICE ( 7 )
Judicial Branch
WRIT Section
Decision Date
17-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OF NO COSTS
Last updated 19-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Mrs. Vuppala Shobha Rani
Adv. SUDARSHAN MALUGARI
Respondent(s)
-
1.The Union of India, Advocate - N BHUJANGA RAO Deputy Solicitor General of India
-
2.The Regional Passport Officer,
-
3.Pedapati Roja Rani,
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
18-Jun-2026
B.Vijaysen ReddyView PDF
Summary of WP/18597/2026 The Telangana High Court disposed of Mrs. Vuppala Shobha Rani's petition challenging the Regional Passport Officer's rejection of her passport renewal application solely on grounds of a pending dowry case (IPC 498-A). Rather than directly granting the renewal, the court directed the petitioner to approach the trial court handling the criminal case to seek a No Objection Certificate (NOC) for passport renewal, which the trial court must dispose of within two weeks after hearing the complainant. The court did not decide the substantive merits regarding whether pending criminal proceedings alone justify passport denial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Jun-2026
Admission (Central Govt.)
B.Vijaysen Reddy
-
15-Jun-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/18597/2026
Summary of WP/18597/2026 The Telangana High Court disposed of Mrs. Vuppala Shobha Rani's petition challenging the Regional Passport Officer's rejection of her passport renewal application solely on grounds of a pending dowry case (IPC 498-A). Rather than directly granting the renewal, the court directed the petitioner to approach the trial court handling the criminal case to seek a No Objection Certificate (NOC) for passport renewal, which the trial court must dispose of within two weeks after hearing the complainant. The court did not decide the substantive merits regarding whether pending criminal proceedings alone justify passport denial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts