Mr. Lakavath Praveen Kumar vs The State of Telangana Advocate - GP FOR HOME — WP/18772/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: 02nd July 2026.

Next hearing 02-Jul-2026

CNR: HBHC010379862026

Filing Number

WP/27505/2026

Filing Date

15-Jun-2026

Registration No

WP/18772/2026

Registration Date

17-Jun-2026

Judge

T.madhavi Devi

Coram

T.madhavi Devi

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

WP ( 28 )

Sub-Category

HOME DEPARTMENT ( 22 )

Judicial Branch

WRIT Section

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Mr. Lakavath Praveen Kumar

    Adv. CH JAGANNATHA CHARY

  2. 2.Smt. Ritu Moni @ Reetu Rao

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of Telangana Advocate - GP FOR HOME

  2. 2.The Director General of Police

  3. 3.The Assistant Commissioner of Police

  4. 4.The Station House Officer

  5. 5.The Foreigners Regional Registration Officer and Civil Authority

    Adv. N BHUJANGA RAO Deputy Solicitor General of India

  6. 6.The Superintendent / Officer-in-Charge

    Adv. GP FOR WOMEN DEV CHILD WELFARE

Case History

  1. 02-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 02-Jul-2026

    Admission (Home)

    T.madhavi Devi

  3. 18-Jun-2026

    T.madhavi DeviView PDF

    Case Summary: WP/18772/2026 Outcome: The writ petition was issued a notice before admission on 18.06.2026. The court adjourned the matter to 02.07.2026 after the Assistant Government Pleader and Additional Solicitor General requested time to obtain instructions from their respective respondent departments. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 18-Jun-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 15-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/18772/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP/18772/2026 Outcome: The writ petition was issued a notice before admission on 18.06.2026. The court adjourned the matter to 02.07.2026 after the Assistant Government Pleader and Additional Solicitor General requested time to obtain instructions from their respective respondent departments. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case