Mr. Pankaj Wadhwa vs The State of Telangana, Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR — CRLP/8937/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528. Next hearing: 08th July 2026.
CNR: HBHC010377432026
Filing Number
CRLP/10413/2026
Filing Date
12-Jun-2026
Registration No
CRLP/8937/2026
Registration Date
16-Jun-2026
Judge
J Sreenivas Rao
Coram
J Sreenivas Rao
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRLP ( 41 )
Sub-Category
U/s.482 Cr.p.c Quash the F.I.R ( 63 )
Judicial Branch
CRIMINAL Section
Last updated 19-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Mr. Pankaj Wadhwa
Adv. MOHIT JAIN
-
2.Pandi Vamshi Shiva Ramanjaneya Krishna Prasad alias Ramu
Respondent(s)
-
1.The State of Telangana, Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
-
2.Mohd Ghouse Pasha
Case History
-
08-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
08-Jul-2026
For Admission
J Sreenivas Rao
-
18-Jun-2026
J Sreenivas RaoView PDF
Case Summary: CRLP 8937/2026 The High Court of Telangana adjourned the criminal petition seeking to quash FIR No. 1352/2022 (Cyber Crime charges under IT Act Sections 66(C), (D) and IPC Sections 419, 420). The petitioners and respondent No. 2 reached a settlement and filed compromise applications. The court directed both parties to appear before the High Court Legal Services Committee by 30.06.2026 for identification, with the case relisted on 08.07.2026 for further proceedings on the compromise. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Jun-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
12-Jun-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CRLP/8937/2026
Case Summary: CRLP 8937/2026 The High Court of Telangana adjourned the criminal petition seeking to quash FIR No. 1352/2022 (Cyber Crime charges under IT Act Sections 66(C), (D) and IPC Sections 419, 420). The petitioners and respondent No. 2 reached a settlement and filed compromise applications. The court directed both parties to appear before the High Court Legal Services Committee by 30.06.2026 for identification, with the case relisted on 08.07.2026 for further proceedings on the compromise. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts