Kothapalli Daveedu Raju, vs STATE OF TELANGANA, Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR — CRLP/8807/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 480&483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED NO COSTS on 18th June 2026.
CNR: HBHC010376852026
Filing Number
CRLP/10400/2026
Filing Date
12-Jun-2026
Registration No
CRLP/8807/2026
Registration Date
12-Jun-2026
Judge
K. Sujana
Coram
K. Sujana
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRLP ( 41 )
Sub-Category
U/s.437 and 439 Cr.p.c Regular Bail ( 62 )
Judicial Branch
CRIMINAL Section
Decision Date
18-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED NO COSTS
Last updated 19-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Kothapalli Daveedu Raju,
Adv. G SUNIL KUMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF TELANGANA, Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
22-Jun-2026
Interlocutory(fresh Bail Petitions)
K. Sujana
-
18-Jun-2026
K. SujanaView PDF
Case Summary: CRLP/8807/2026 The Telangana High Court granted bail to Kothapalli Daveedu Raju, accused of offences under Sections 69 and 88 of the BNS Act involving alleged promise of marriage followed by sexual relations and forced abortions. The court found that the petitioner had been in judicial custody since May 2, 2026, investigation was substantially complete with 12 witnesses examined, and the long incarceration period warranted release pending trial. Bail conditions imposed: Rs. 25,000 personal bond with two sureties, weekly police station appearances for 8 weeks, and compliance with standard bail provisions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
15-Jun-2026
K. SujanaView PDF
-
15-Jun-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
12-Jun-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CRLP/8807/2026
Case Summary: CRLP/8807/2026 The Telangana High Court granted bail to Kothapalli Daveedu Raju, accused of offences under Sections 69 and 88 of the BNS Act involving alleged promise of marriage followed by sexual relations and forced abortions. The court found that the petitioner had been in judicial custody since May 2, 2026, investigation was substantially complete with 12 witnesses examined, and the long incarceration period warranted release pending trial. Bail conditions imposed: Rs. 25,000 personal bond with two sureties, weekly police station appearances for 8 weeks, and compliance with standard bail provisions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts