Sampathi Ramchandra Reddy vs The State of Telangana Advocate - GP FOR IRRI AND COMM AREA DEV — WP/18093/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: 15th July 2026.
CNR: HBHC010374182026
Filing Number
WP/27100/2026
Filing Date
11-Jun-2026
Registration No
WP/18093/2026
Registration Date
12-Jun-2026
Judge
Namavarapu Rajeshwar Rao
Coram
Namavarapu Rajeshwar Rao
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
WP ( 28 )
Sub-Category
MISCELLANEOUS ( 10 )
Judicial Branch
WRIT Section
Last updated 19-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Sampathi Ramchandra Reddy
Adv. MUDDAM VISHAL REDDY
Respondent(s)
-
1.The State of Telangana Advocate - GP FOR IRRI AND COMM AREA DEV
-
2.The Superintending Engineer
-
3.The Executive Engineer
-
4.The Deputy Executive Engineer
-
5.Sri C. Kranti Kumar Reddy
-
6.Sri Pindi Rama Krishna Reddy
-
7.Sri P. Satyanarayana Reddy
Case History
-
15-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
15-Jul-2026
Admission (Irrigation)
Namavarapu Rajeshwar Rao
-
18-Jun-2026
Namavarapu Rajeshwar RaoView PDF
Case Summary: WP/18093/2026 The High Court of Telangana heard Sampathi Ramchandra Reddy's petition regarding alleged encroachment on his land on 17.06.2026. The Court granted the respondents time to file a counter-affidavit and conditionally ordered that if encroaching construction is established, the respondents must remove/demolish it per law. The petitioner's counsel was permitted to serve personal notice on respondents 6 and 7 via Speed Post. The case was adjourned to 25.07.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Jun-2026
Admission (Irrigation)
Namavarapu Rajeshwar Rao
-
15-Jun-2026
Namavarapu Rajeshwar RaoView PDF
-
15-Jun-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
11-Jun-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/18093/2026
Case Summary: WP/18093/2026 The High Court of Telangana heard Sampathi Ramchandra Reddy's petition regarding alleged encroachment on his land on 17.06.2026. The Court granted the respondents time to file a counter-affidavit and conditionally ordered that if encroaching construction is established, the respondents must remove/demolish it per law. The petitioner's counsel was permitted to serve personal notice on respondents 6 and 7 via Speed Post. The case was adjourned to 25.07.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts