Kokati Santosh, vs The State of Telangana, Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR — CRLP/8688/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 480,483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED NO COSTS on 19th June 2026.
CNR: HBHC010373722026
Filing Number
CRLP/10302/2026
Filing Date
11-Jun-2026
Registration No
CRLP/8688/2026
Registration Date
11-Jun-2026
Judge
K. Sujana
Coram
K. Sujana
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRLP ( 41 )
Sub-Category
U/s.437 and 439 Cr.p.c Regular Bail ( 62 )
Judicial Branch
CRIMINAL Section
Decision Date
19-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED NO COSTS
Last updated 20-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Kokati Santosh,
Adv. RAMESH KADARI
Respondent(s)
-
1.The State of Telangana, Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
-
2.The Station House Officer, Keesara Police Station,
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
19-Jun-2026
K. SujanaView PDF
Case Summary: CRLP/8688/2026 Kokati Santosh sought bail in a case involving allegations of domestic assault under Section 109 BNS, filed after complaints that he consumed alcohol and brutally beat the alleged victim causing bleeding injuries. The High Court granted bail after finding that investigation was substantially complete (8 witnesses examined), the petitioner had been in custody since March 17, 2026, and bail conditions could adequately protect witnesses. Conditions included a Rs.10,000 personal bond with sureties, weekly reporting to police for 8 weeks, prohibition from contacting victim/witnesses, and compliance with standard bail conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
19-Jun-2026
Interlocutory(fresh Bail Petitions)
K. Sujana
-
12-Jun-2026
K. SujanaView PDF
-
12-Jun-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
11-Jun-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CRLP/8688/2026
Case Summary: CRLP/8688/2026 Kokati Santosh sought bail in a case involving allegations of domestic assault under Section 109 BNS, filed after complaints that he consumed alcohol and brutally beat the alleged victim causing bleeding injuries. The High Court granted bail after finding that investigation was substantially complete (8 witnesses examined), the petitioner had been in custody since March 17, 2026, and bail conditions could adequately protect witnesses. Conditions included a Rs.10,000 personal bond with sureties, weekly reporting to police for 8 weeks, prohibition from contacting victim/witnesses, and compliance with standard bail conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts