Karad Yashwanth vs State of Telangana, Advocate - GP FOR REVENUE — WP/17796/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Status: For Admission. Next hearing: 09th July 2026.

For Admission Next hearing 09-Jul-2026 this date has passed

CNR: HBHC010368202026

Filing Number

WP/26690/2026

Filing Date

10-Jun-2026

Registration No

WP/17796/2026

Registration Date

10-Jun-2026

Judge

B.Vijaysen Reddy

Coram

B.Vijaysen Reddy

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

WP ( 28 )

Sub-Category

REVENUE ( 37 )

Judicial Branch

WRIT Section

Last updated 13-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Karad Yashwanth

    Adv. SOMA RAVI KIRAN REDDY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Telangana, Advocate - GP FOR REVENUE

  2. 2.The District Collector,

  3. 3.The Tahsiladar,

  4. 4.The I.T.D.A, Utnoor,

    Adv. GP FOR SOCIAL WELFARE

Case History

  1. 09-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 09-Jul-2026

    For Admission

    B.Vijaysen Reddy

  3. 11-Jun-2026

    B.Vijaysen ReddyView PDF

    Case Summary: WP/17848/2026 In this land assignment case, the petitioner challenged the State's classification of assigned land as government property. The court found that the original assignee violated assignment conditions by selling the land to third parties, leading to its resumption and Kharij Khata (forfeiture) recording. The petitioner's name was never recorded in revenue records. The court denied interim relief and adjourned the case to 09.07.2026, directing respondents to file a counter-affidavit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 11-Jun-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 10-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/17796/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP/17848/2026 In this land assignment case, the petitioner challenged the State's classification of assigned land as government property. The court found that the original assignee violated assignment conditions by selling the land to third parties, leading to its resumption and Kharij Khata (forfeiture) recording. The petitioner's name was never recorded in revenue records. The court denied interim relief and adjourned the case to 09.07.2026, directing respondents to file a counter-affidavit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case