Chinna Pasi vs The State of Telangana Advocate - GP FOR REVENUE — WP/17790/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Status: Admission (Revenue). Next hearing: 09th July 2026.
CNR: HBHC010367922026
Filing Number
WP/26675/2026
Filing Date
10-Jun-2026
Registration No
WP/17790/2026
Registration Date
10-Jun-2026
Judge
B.Vijaysen Reddy
Coram
B.Vijaysen Reddy
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
WP ( 28 )
Sub-Category
NOT TO INTERFERE ( 58 )
Judicial Branch
WRIT Section
Last updated 13-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Chinna Pasi
Adv. K RAGHAVA RAMANA
-
2.SmtKaisalya Bai Pasi
Respondent(s)
-
1.The State of Telangana Advocate - GP FOR REVENUE
-
2.The District Collector
-
3.The Tahsildar
-
4.The Divisional Forest Officer
Adv. GP FOR FORESTS
Case History
-
09-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
09-Jul-2026
Admission (Revenue)
B.Vijaysen Reddy
-
11-Jun-2026
B.Vijaysen ReddyView PDF
Case Summary: WP 17790/2026 Outcome: Case adjourned to 09.07.2026 with interim protective orders. The Telangana High Court partially granted interim relief to petitioners Chinna Pasi and Kaisalya Bai Pasi, who challenged forest department attempts to dispossess them from 10.15 acres of land in Rompaid Village. The court directed the Tahsildar and Divisional Forest Officer not to interfere with petitioners' possession of any plantations or standing crops without following due process of law, while permitting land demarcation activities. Respondents must file counters by the next hearing date, and all respondent actions remain subject to further court orders. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-Jun-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
10-Jun-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/17790/2026
Case Summary: WP 17790/2026 Outcome: Case adjourned to 09.07.2026 with interim protective orders. The Telangana High Court partially granted interim relief to petitioners Chinna Pasi and Kaisalya Bai Pasi, who challenged forest department attempts to dispossess them from 10.15 acres of land in Rompaid Village. The court directed the Tahsildar and Divisional Forest Officer not to interfere with petitioners' possession of any plantations or standing crops without following due process of law, while permitting land demarcation activities. Respondents must file counters by the next hearing date, and all respondent actions remain subject to further court orders. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts