M. Bhaskar Reddy vs The State of Telangana Advocate - GP FOR HOME — WP/17730/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: 09th July 2026.

Next hearing 09-Jul-2026

CNR: HBHC010365552026

Filing Number

WP/26501/2026

Filing Date

09-Jun-2026

Registration No

WP/17730/2026

Registration Date

10-Jun-2026

Judge

E.V. Venugopal

Coram

E.V. Venugopal

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

WP ( 28 )

Sub-Category

NOT TO INTERFERE IN CIVIL DISPUTES ( 19 )

Judicial Branch

WRIT Section

Last updated 13-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M. Bhaskar Reddy

    Adv. A NAJEEB KHAN

  2. 2.K. Naveen Kumar Goud

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of Telangana Advocate - GP FOR HOME

  2. 2.The Commissioner of Police

  3. 3.The Inspector of Police

  4. 4.Mr. Raghavendra

  5. 5.V. Lokeswara Reddy

Case History

  1. 09-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 09-Jul-2026

    Admission (Home)

    E.V. Venugopal

  3. 11-Jun-2026

    E.V. VenugopalView PDF

    Case Summary: WP/17730/2026 The Telangana High Court admitted the petition by M. Bhaskar Reddy and K. Naveen Kumar Goud, who alleged official respondents were interfering with their personal liberty at the behest of unofficial respondents in a related civil dispute (O.S.No.1385 of 2025). As an interim measure, the Inspector of Police was directed not to interfere with the petitioners' personal life and liberty except under due process of law. The matter was adjourned to 09.07.2026 for further hearing pending submission of counter-affidavits from official respondents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 11-Jun-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 09-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/17730/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP/17730/2026 The Telangana High Court admitted the petition by M. Bhaskar Reddy and K. Naveen Kumar Goud, who alleged official respondents were interfering with their personal liberty at the behest of unofficial respondents in a related civil dispute (O.S.No.1385 of 2025). As an interim measure, the Inspector of Police was directed not to interfere with the petitioners' personal life and liberty except under due process of law. The matter was adjourned to 09.07.2026 for further hearing pending submission of counter-affidavits from official respondents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case