Mohammed Akbar vs Union of India Advocate - N BHUJANGA RAO Deputy Solicitor General of India — WP/18398/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: 19th June 2026.

Next hearing 19-Jun-2026

CNR: HBHC010364312026

Filing Number

WP/26402/2026

Filing Date

09-Jun-2026

Registration No

WP/18398/2026

Registration Date

15-Jun-2026

Judge

B.Vijaysen Reddy

Coram

B.Vijaysen Reddy

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

WP ( 28 )

Sub-Category

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT MATTERS ( 7 )

Judicial Branch

WRIT Section

Last updated 17-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Mohammed Akbar

    Adv. M KESHAV YADAV

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Union of India Advocate - N BHUJANGA RAO Deputy Solicitor General of India

  2. 2.Reserve Bank of India (RBI)

  3. 3.IDFC First Bank

  4. 4.Bajaj Finance Limited

  5. 5.SBI Cards and Payment services limited

  6. 6.RBL BANK LIMITED

  7. 7.Aditya Birla Capital Ltd

Case History

  1. 19-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 19-Jun-2026

    For Admission

    B.Vijaysen Reddy

  3. 16-Jun-2026

    B.Vijaysen ReddyView PDF

    Case Summary: WP 18398/2026 In WP 18398/2026 before the Telangana High Court, petitioner Mohammed Akbar filed against the Union of India, RBI, and IDFC First Bank. On 16.06.2026, the Central Government's standing counsel accepted notice on behalf of respondent No.1. The court adjourned the matter to 19.06.2026 for listing in the Motion List. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 16-Jun-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 09-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/18398/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP 18398/2026 In WP 18398/2026 before the Telangana High Court, petitioner Mohammed Akbar filed against the Union of India, RBI, and IDFC First Bank. On 16.06.2026, the Central Government's standing counsel accepted notice on behalf of respondent No.1. The court adjourned the matter to 19.06.2026 for listing in the Motion List. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case