G. Muralidhar Goud vs The State of Telangana Advocate - GP FOR PROHIBITION EXCISE — WP/17601/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: 23rd July 2026.
CNR: HBHC010361032026
Filing Number
WP/26158/2026
Filing Date
08-Jun-2026
Registration No
WP/17601/2026
Registration Date
09-Jun-2026
Judge
E.V. Venugopal
Coram
E.V. Venugopal
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
WP ( 28 )
Sub-Category
TODDY TAPPERS COOP SOCIETIES ( 19 )
Judicial Branch
WRIT Section
Last updated 13-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.G. Muralidhar Goud
Adv. J. RAGHURAM
-
2.N. Shiva Shanker
-
3.G Ravi Kumar
-
4.G Krishna Kumar Goud
-
5.Srikar Goud
-
6.G. Sudhakar Goud
-
7.G. Nagaphanindra Goud
-
8.K. Karthik Goud
-
9.G. Vijayalaxmi Goud
-
10.G. Anjilamma
-
11.Gummadala Nagasri
-
12.Yadaiah Goud
-
13.Varun Goud
Respondent(s)
-
1.The State of Telangana Advocate - GP FOR PROHIBITION EXCISE
-
2.The State Co-operative Election Authority/FAC/ Additional Registrar
-
3.The District Prohibition and Excise Officer/ Superintendent Functional Registrar
-
4.The Additional/Registrar/ State Cooperative Election Authority
-
5.The Election Officer/ Prohibition and Excise Sub-inspector
-
6.Toddy Tappers Co-Operative Society
Case History
-
23-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
23-Jul-2026
Admission (Excise)
E.V. Venugopal
-
11-Jun-2026
E.V. VenugopalView PDF
In WP No. 17601/2026, the High Court of Telangana adjourned the case on 11.06.2026 and listed it for further hearing on 23.07.2026 at the request of the Government Pleader for the Excise Department to obtain further instructions. Counsel for all parties were present. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-Jun-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
08-Jun-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/17601/2026
In WP No. 17601/2026, the High Court of Telangana adjourned the case on 11.06.2026 and listed it for further hearing on 23.07.2026 at the request of the Government Pleader for the Excise Department to obtain further instructions. Counsel for all parties were present. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts