Maniac Rao vs The State of Telangana Advocate - GP FOR ENERGY — WP/18758/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: 25th June 2026.

Next hearing 25-Jun-2026

CNR: HBHC010360152026

Filing Number

WP/26093/2026

Filing Date

08-Jun-2026

Registration No

WP/18758/2026

Registration Date

17-Jun-2026

Judge

Nagesh Bheemapaka

Coram

Nagesh Bheemapaka

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

WP ( 28 )

Sub-Category

TSSEB ( 100 )

Judicial Branch

WRIT Section

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Maniac Rao

    Adv. M S ANWAR SIDDIQUI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of Telangana Advocate - GP FOR ENERGY

  2. 2.The Union of India

    Adv. N BHUJANGA RAO Deputy Solicitor General of India

  3. 3.The Chairman and Managing Director

  4. 4.The Regional Manager

  5. 5.Director

  6. 6.The State of Telangana

    Adv. GP FOR REVENUE

  7. 7.The District Collector-Cum-District Magistrate

  8. 8.The Tahsildar

Case History

  1. 25-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 25-Jun-2026

    For Admission

    Nagesh Bheemapaka

  3. 18-Jun-2026

    Nagesh BheemapakaView PDF

    On 18.06.2026, the Telangana High Court admitted the writ petition WP/18758/2026 filed by Maniac Rao against the State of Telangana and the Union of India. Notice was served on all respondents, with the Union of India waiving further notice. The matter was adjourned to 25.06.2026 for the respondents to file their counter affidavit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 18-Jun-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 08-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/18758/2026

casestatus.in Summary

On 18.06.2026, the Telangana High Court admitted the writ petition WP/18758/2026 filed by Maniac Rao against the State of Telangana and the Union of India. Notice was served on all respondents, with the Union of India waiving further notice. The matter was adjourned to 25.06.2026 for the respondents to file their counter affidavit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case