B. Kiran Kumar vs The Union of India Advocate - N BHUJANGA RAO Deputy Solicitor General of India — WP/18276/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: HBHC010360002026

Filing Number

WP/26083/2026

Filing Date

08-Jun-2026

Registration No

WP/18276/2026

Registration Date

12-Jun-2026

Judge

Aparesh Kumar Singh , G.M. Mohiuddin

Coram

Aparesh Kumar Singh , G.M. Mohiuddin

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

WP ( 28 )

Sub-Category

SERVICE MATTERS ( 12 )

Judicial Branch

WRIT Section

Last updated 17-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.B. Kiran Kumar

    Adv. K S V SUBBA RAO

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The Union of India Advocate - N BHUJANGA RAO Deputy Solicitor General of India

  2. 2.National Institute of Fashion Technology

  3. 3.National Institute of Fashion Technology,

  4. 4.National Institute of Fashion Technology,

  5. 5.National Institute of Fashion Technology,

  6. 6.Department of Employment and Training for the State of Andhra Pradesh,

    Adv. B RAJESHWAR REDDY (G.P. FOR STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH)

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 16-Jun-2026

    Aparesh Kumar Singh,g.m. MohiuddinView PDF

    Case Summary: W.P.No.18276 of 2026 On 16.06.2026, the High Court of Telangana found that the writ petition was not related to both successor States and the State of Telangana was not a party. Since a similar matter (W.P.No.11606 of 2026) had been previously disposed of by a Single Bench, the Court transferred the petition to an appropriate Single Bench for further proceedings. The case was not adjudicated on merits but redirected based on jurisdictional grounds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Jun-2026

    For Admission (Fresh Matters)

    Aparesh Kumar Singh , G.M. Mohiuddin

  4. 08-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/18276/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: W.P.No.18276 of 2026 On 16.06.2026, the High Court of Telangana found that the writ petition was not related to both successor States and the State of Telangana was not a party. Since a similar matter (W.P.No.11606 of 2026) had been previously disposed of by a Single Bench, the Court transferred the petition to an appropriate Single Bench for further proceedings. The case was not adjudicated on merits but redirected based on jurisdictional grounds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case