SALMAN ALI QUADRI vs The State of Telangana Advocate - GP FOR HOME — WP/17658/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: 09th July 2026.

Next hearing 09-Jul-2026

CNR: HBHC010359552026

Filing Number

WP/26062/2026

Filing Date

08-Jun-2026

Registration No

WP/17658/2026

Registration Date

09-Jun-2026

Judge

E.V. Venugopal

Coram

E.V. Venugopal

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

WP ( 28 )

Sub-Category

NOT TO HARASS ( 6 )

Judicial Branch

WRIT Section

Last updated 13-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SALMAN ALI QUADRI

    Adv. JALIB HASAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of Telangana Advocate - GP FOR HOME

  2. 2.The Commissioner of Police

  3. 3.The Dy. Commissioner of Police

  4. 4.The Station House Officer

Case History

  1. 09-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 09-Jul-2026

    Admission (Home)

    E.V. Venugopal

  3. 11-Jun-2026

    E.V. VenugopalView PDF

    Case Summary: WP/17658/2026 On 11.06.2026, the Telangana High Court admitted the petition and issued an interim protective order. The petitioner alleged he was called to the police station without notice and without any crime registration against him. The court directed the Commissioner of Police (respondent No.4) not to interfere with the petitioner's personal liberty except through due process of law, and adjourned the matter to 09.07.2026 for detailed examination after the respondents file their counter-affidavit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 11-Jun-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 08-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/17658/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP/17658/2026 On 11.06.2026, the Telangana High Court admitted the petition and issued an interim protective order. The petitioner alleged he was called to the police station without notice and without any crime registration against him. The court directed the Commissioner of Police (respondent No.4) not to interfere with the petitioner's personal liberty except through due process of law, and adjourned the matter to 09.07.2026 for detailed examination after the respondents file their counter-affidavit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case