Dasari Naveen Kumar, vs The State of Telangana Advocate - GP FOR REVENUE — WP/17848/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: 09th July 2026.
CNR: HBHC010358182026
Filing Number
WP/25975/2026
Filing Date
08-Jun-2026
Registration No
WP/17848/2026
Registration Date
10-Jun-2026
Judge
B.Vijaysen Reddy
Coram
B.Vijaysen Reddy
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
WP ( 28 )
Sub-Category
NOT TO DISPOSSES ( 40 )
Judicial Branch
WRIT Section
Last updated 13-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Dasari Naveen Kumar,
Adv. MOHD SUBHAN PASHA
Respondent(s)
-
1.The State of Telangana Advocate - GP FOR REVENUE
-
2.The District Collector,
-
3.The Revenue Divisional Officer
-
4.The Tahsildar,
Case History
-
09-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
09-Jul-2026
For Admission
B.Vijaysen Reddy
-
11-Jun-2026
B.Vijaysen ReddyView PDF
Case Summary: WP 17848/2026 In this land dispute petition, Dasari Naveen Kumar challenged the State of Telangana's land records. The court heard that assigned agricultural land in Survey No.131/2 (Vattinagulapally Village) was previously assigned to Dasari Chinna Lachaiah but was resumed by revenue authorities as Kharij Khata (government land) after subsequent owners violated assignment conditions by selling it to third parties. The court rejected the petitioner's request for interim relief, noting his name was never recorded in revenue records and the disputed land is classified as government property. The case was adjourned to 09.07.2026 with directions for respondents to file their counter affidavit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-Jun-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
08-Jun-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/17848/2026
Case Summary: WP 17848/2026 In this land dispute petition, Dasari Naveen Kumar challenged the State of Telangana's land records. The court heard that assigned agricultural land in Survey No.131/2 (Vattinagulapally Village) was previously assigned to Dasari Chinna Lachaiah but was resumed by revenue authorities as Kharij Khata (government land) after subsequent owners violated assignment conditions by selling it to third parties. The court rejected the petitioner's request for interim relief, noting his name was never recorded in revenue records and the disputed land is classified as government property. The case was adjourned to 09.07.2026 with directions for respondents to file their counter affidavit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts