SVEYDI INFRUCTURES PVT LTD vs The State of Telangana Advocate - GP FOR ENERGY — WP/17346/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: 22nd June 2026.

Next hearing 22-Jun-2026

CNR: HBHC010355242026

Filing Number

WP/25770/2026

Filing Date

08-Jun-2026

Registration No

WP/17346/2026

Registration Date

08-Jun-2026

Judge

Surepalli Nanda

Coram

Surepalli Nanda

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

WP ( 28 )

Sub-Category

MISCELLANEOUS ( 38 )

Judicial Branch

WRIT Section

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SVEYDI INFRUCTURES PVT LTD

    Adv. P NAGENDRA REDDY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of Telangana Advocate - GP FOR ENERGY

  2. 2.The Singareni Collieries Company Limited

Case History

  1. 22-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 22-Jun-2026

    Admission (Energy)

    Surepalli Nanda

  3. 08-Jun-2026

    Surepalli NandaView PDF

    Case Summary: WP/17346/2026 The Telangana High Court rejected SVEYDI INFRUCTURES PVT LTD's petition challenging the eligibility conditions under Clause-3 of the pre-qualification procedure, finding the petitioner's plea that bidder participation was restricted unconvincing based on SSCL's written instructions. The court declined to grant interim relief, relying on Supreme Court precedent that tender terms are contractual matters outside judicial scrutiny and that courts should not adjudicate technical issues. The matter was adjourned to 22.06.2026 for the respondents' counter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 08-Jun-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 08-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/17346/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP/17346/2026 The Telangana High Court rejected SVEYDI INFRUCTURES PVT LTD's petition challenging the eligibility conditions under Clause-3 of the pre-qualification procedure, finding the petitioner's plea that bidder participation was restricted unconvincing based on SSCL's written instructions. The court declined to grant interim relief, relying on Supreme Court precedent that tender terms are contractual matters outside judicial scrutiny and that courts should not adjudicate technical issues. The matter was adjourned to 22.06.2026 for the respondents' counter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case