Angothu Naveen vs State of Telangana Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR — CRLP/8272/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 480,483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED NO COSTS on 16th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HBHC010354912026

Filing Number

CRLP/9742/2026

Filing Date

08-Jun-2026

Registration No

CRLP/8272/2026

Registration Date

08-Jun-2026

Judge

K. Sujana

Coram

K. Sujana

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRLP ( 41 )

Sub-Category

U/s.437 and 439 Cr.p.c Regular Bail ( 62 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL Section

Decision Date

16-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED NO COSTS

Last updated 17-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 480,483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Angothu Naveen

    Adv. L V RAMANA RAO

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Telangana Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Jun-2026

    K. SujanaView PDF

    CRLP/8272/2026 - Summary Angothu Naveen, accused no.3 in FIR 752/2026, sought bail for charges under BNS sections 74, 75, 78, 329(3), and 309(4) involving alleged mobile phone theft, trespass, and misconduct with female students at a university campus. Justice K. Sujana granted bail, finding that most prosecution witnesses had already been examined, the incarceration duration warranted release, and while the allegations were serious, the investigation stage supported conditional bail. Conditions: Rs.25,000 personal bond with two sureties, weekly reporting to police on Mondays for eight weeks or until charge sheet filing, and compliance with standard bail conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Jun-2026

    Interlocutory(fresh Bail Petitions)

    K. Sujana

  4. 09-Jun-2026

    K. SujanaView PDF

  5. 09-Jun-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 08-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRLP/8272/2026

casestatus.in Summary

CRLP/8272/2026 - Summary Angothu Naveen, accused no.3 in FIR 752/2026, sought bail for charges under BNS sections 74, 75, 78, 329(3), and 309(4) involving alleged mobile phone theft, trespass, and misconduct with female students at a university campus. Justice K. Sujana granted bail, finding that most prosecution witnesses had already been examined, the incarceration duration warranted release, and while the allegations were serious, the investigation stage supported conditional bail. Conditions: Rs.25,000 personal bond with two sureties, weekly reporting to police on Mondays for eight weeks or until charge sheet filing, and compliance with standard bail conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case