VANGALA RAVINDER REDDY vs UGGAM VENKATAMMA Advocate - T SANDHYA RANI — WA/574/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 11th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HBHC010352742026

Filing Number

WA/25593/2026

Filing Date

06-Jun-2026

Registration No

WA/574/2026

Registration Date

09-Jun-2026

Judge

Moushumi Bhattacharya , Gadi Praveen Kumar

Coram

Moushumi Bhattacharya , Gadi Praveen Kumar

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

WA ( 27 )

Sub-Category

REVENUE ( 37 )

Judicial Branch

WRIT Section

Decision Date

11-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 13-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.VANGALA RAVINDER REDDY

    Adv. VIJAY B PAROPAKARI

  2. 2.Kumbam Surender Reddy

  3. 3.Smt Uggam Venkatamma

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.UGGAM VENKATAMMA Advocate - T SANDHYA RANI

  2. 2.The Chief Commissioner of Land Administration CCLA

  3. 3.The Collector and District Magistrate

  4. 4.The Revenue Divisional Officer

  5. 5.The Tahsildar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Jun-2026

    Moushumi Bhattacharya,gadi Praveen KumarView PDF

    The High Court of Telangana dismissed the Writ Appeal filed by Vangala Ravinder Reddy, Kumbam Surender Reddy, and Smt Uggam Venkatamma on 11.06.2026. The court granted leave on one interlocutory application while dispensing with another, ultimately upholding the lower court's decision as detailed in a separate judgment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Jun-2026

    For Admission

    Moushumi Bhattacharya , Gadi Praveen Kumar

  4. 06-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WA/574/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Telangana dismissed the Writ Appeal filed by Vangala Ravinder Reddy, Kumbam Surender Reddy, and Smt Uggam Venkatamma on 11.06.2026. The court granted leave on one interlocutory application while dispensing with another, ultimately upholding the lower court's decision as detailed in a separate judgment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case