Church of South India Trust Association, vs Union of India Advocate - N BHUJANGA RAO Deputy Solicitor General of India — WP/17119/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: 02nd July 2026.

Next hearing 02-Jul-2026

CNR: HBHC010350962026

Filing Number

WP/25462/2026

Filing Date

04-Jun-2026

Registration No

WP/17119/2026

Registration Date

04-Jun-2026

Judge

Nagesh Bheemapaka

Coram

Nagesh Bheemapaka

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

WP ( 28 )

Sub-Category

MINISTRIES OF CENTRAL GOVT. ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

WRIT Section

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Church of South India Trust Association,

    Adv. A SRINIVAS

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Union of India Advocate - N BHUJANGA RAO Deputy Solicitor General of India

  2. 2.National Highway Authority of India Ltd

  3. 3.National Highway Authority of India Ltd

  4. 4.Athaang Dichpally Tollway Pvt Ltd

  5. 5.The Station House Officer

  6. 6.The Tahsildar

Case History

  1. 02-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 02-Jul-2026

    Admission (Central Govt.)

    Nagesh Bheemapaka

  3. 04-Jun-2026

    Nagesh BheemapakaView PDF

  4. 04-Jun-2026

    Nagesh BheemapakaView PDF

    Case Summary: WP/17119/2026 Court Order (04.06.2026): The Telangana High Court adjourned the petition to 02.07.2026 after hearing all parties. The Court granted status-quo relief, directing respondents to maintain the existing position and prohibiting any coercive action regarding the petitioner's compound wall pending the next hearing. The petitioner had previously submitted a detailed explanation to an impugned notice dated 08.06.2024, but the respondents had not yet passed orders on it. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 04-Jun-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 04-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/17119/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP/17119/2026 Court Order (04.06.2026): The Telangana High Court adjourned the petition to 02.07.2026 after hearing all parties. The Court granted status-quo relief, directing respondents to maintain the existing position and prohibiting any coercive action regarding the petitioner's compound wall pending the next hearing. The petitioner had previously submitted a detailed explanation to an impugned notice dated 08.06.2024, but the respondents had not yet passed orders on it. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case