VANGAPELLY LAXMA REDDY vs THE STATE OF TELANGANA Advocate - GP FOR STAMPS AND REGISTRATION — WP/18284/2024
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: 28th April 2026.
CNR: HBHC010350552024
Filing Number
WP/26019/2024
Filing Date
09-Jul-2024
Registration No
WP/18284/2024
Registration Date
10-Jul-2024
Judge
Pulla Karthik
Coram
Pulla Karthik
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
WP ( 28 )
Sub-Category
STAMPS & REGISTRATION ( 70 )
Judicial Branch
WRIT Section
Last updated 27-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.VANGAPELLY LAXMA REDDY
Adv. SURENDRA DESAI
-
2.VANGAPELLY PUSPA LATHA
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF TELANGANA Advocate - GP FOR STAMPS AND REGISTRATION
-
2.The Commissioner and Inspector General of Registration and Stamps
-
3.The District Registrar of Stamps and Assurances
-
4.The Sub-Registrar
-
5.The District Collector
Adv. GP FOR REVENUE
-
6.The Revenue Divisional Officer
-
7.The Tahasildar
Case History
-
28-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
28-Apr-2026
Admission
Pulla Karthik
-
31-Mar-2026
Pulla KarthikView PDF
Summary: In Writ Petition No. 18284 of 2024 before the High Court of Telangana, the case was adjourned on 31.03.2026 at the request of the petitioner's counsel to 28.04.2026. The Registry was directed to remove the matter from the "for orders" caption. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
31-Mar-2026
For Admission
Pulla Karthik
-
24-Mar-2026
Pulla KarthikView PDF
-
24-Mar-2026
Admission (Stamps And Registration )
Pulla Karthik
-
17-Mar-2026
Pulla KarthikView PDF
-
26-Feb-2026
Admission
Pulla Karthik
-
29-Jan-2026
Pulla KarthikView PDF
-
31-Jul-2024
Admission
N.v.shravan Kumar
-
15-Jul-2024
Admission (Stamps And Registration )
N.v.shravan Kumar
-
11-Jul-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-Jul-2024
Case filed
Registration No. WP/18284/2024
Summary: In Writ Petition No. 18284 of 2024 before the High Court of Telangana, the case was adjourned on 31.03.2026 at the request of the petitioner's counsel to 28.04.2026. The Registry was directed to remove the matter from the "for orders" caption. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts