Smt. Nama Chinnamma vs The State of Telangana Advocate - GP FOR MCPL ADMN URBAN DEV — WP/17080/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: 02nd July 2026.

Next hearing 02-Jul-2026

CNR: HBHC010350452026

Filing Number

WP/25421/2026

Filing Date

02-Jun-2026

Registration No

WP/17080/2026

Registration Date

02-Jun-2026

Judge

Nagesh Bheemapaka

Coram

Nagesh Bheemapaka

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

WP ( 28 )

Sub-Category

TO BUIDING PERMISSION ( 42 )

Judicial Branch

WRIT Section

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Smt. Nama Chinnamma

    Adv. B GEETA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of Telangana Advocate - GP FOR MCPL ADMN URBAN DEV

  2. 2.The Commissioner

  3. 3.The Section Head/ Town Planning Officer

  4. 4.Smt. Dr. Ramasahayam Indira Reddy

  5. 5.Sri Yeruva Anil Reddy

  6. 6.Sri Pandiri Teja Reddy

Case History

  1. 02-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 02-Jul-2026

    For Admission

    Nagesh Bheemapaka

  3. 04-Jun-2026

    Nagesh BheemapakaView PDF

    In WP No. 17080 of 2026, the Telangana High Court heard petitioner Smt. Nama Chinnamma's petition on 04.06.2026 at the notice stage before admission. The court granted interim relief as prayed and adjourned the matter to 02.07.2026 for further hearing, with notices served on all respondents including the Municipal Administration and Urban Development department and relevant officials. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 04-Jun-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 02-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/17080/2026

casestatus.in Summary

In WP No. 17080 of 2026, the Telangana High Court heard petitioner Smt. Nama Chinnamma's petition on 04.06.2026 at the notice stage before admission. The court granted interim relief as prayed and adjourned the matter to 02.07.2026 for further hearing, with notices served on all respondents including the Municipal Administration and Urban Development department and relevant officials. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case