Kothakonda Bhaskar vs The State of Telangana, Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR — CRLP/8170/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED NO COSTS on 04th June 2026.
CNR: HBHC010349382026
Filing Number
CRLP/9555/2026
Filing Date
29-May-2026
Registration No
CRLP/8170/2026
Registration Date
29-May-2026
Judge
Suddala Chalapathi Rao
Coram
Suddala Chalapathi Rao
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRLP ( 41 )
Sub-Category
U/s.438 Cr.p.c Anticipatory Bail ( 61 )
Judicial Branch
CRIMINAL Section
Decision Date
04-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED NO COSTS
Last updated 05-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Kothakonda Bhaskar
Adv. M RATHAN SINGH
-
2.Kothakonda Nagasai @ Abhishek
-
3.Smt. Konda Shashi Rekha
-
4.Sri Konda Venkataiah
-
5.Sri Konda Manohar
-
6.Sri Konda Srinivas
Respondent(s)
-
1.The State of Telangana, Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
04-Jun-2026
Suddala Chalapathi RaoView PDF
Case Summary: CRLP/8170/2026 The Telangana High Court granted anticipatory bail to six relatives (Accused Nos. 3-8) of a husband accused in a dowry harassment case. The court found that while allegations of physical/mental cruelty and dowry demands were cognizable offenses, the accusations against the relatives were vague and lacked specific overt acts, and the dispute fundamentally stemmed from matrimonial discord. Bail was granted with conditions including Rs. 10,000 bond, weekly investigation cooperation for four weeks, and non-interference with the complainant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-Jun-2026
Interlocutory(fresh Bail Petitions)
Suddala Chalapathi Rao
-
04-Jun-2026
Interlocutory(fresh Bail Petitions)
Suddala Chalapathi Rao
-
29-May-2026
Suddala Chalapathi RaoView PDF
-
29-May-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
29-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CRLP/8170/2026
Case Summary: CRLP/8170/2026 The Telangana High Court granted anticipatory bail to six relatives (Accused Nos. 3-8) of a husband accused in a dowry harassment case. The court found that while allegations of physical/mental cruelty and dowry demands were cognizable offenses, the accusations against the relatives were vague and lacked specific overt acts, and the dispute fundamentally stemmed from matrimonial discord. Bail was granted with conditions including Rs. 10,000 bond, weekly investigation cooperation for four weeks, and non-interference with the complainant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts