Nibraboina Swamy alias Nidraboyina Swamy vs The State of Telangana Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR — CRLP/8149/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED NO COSTS on 04th June 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 29-May-2026

CNR: HBHC010349112026

Filing Number

CRLP/9543/2026

Filing Date

29-May-2026

Registration No

CRLP/8149/2026

Registration Date

29-May-2026

Judge

Suddala Chalapathi Rao

Coram

Suddala Chalapathi Rao

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRLP ( 41 )

Sub-Category

U/s.438 Cr.p.c Anticipatory Bail ( 61 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL Section

Decision Date

04-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED NO COSTS

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Nibraboina Swamy alias Nidraboyina Swamy

    Adv. GUNDARAM MANOJ GOUD

  2. 2.Thupakula Srinivas alias Tupakula Srinivas

  3. 3.Dudekula Jakeer alias Mohammed Zakeer

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of Telangana Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

  2. 2.Naveen Kumar Yellola

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-Jun-2026

    Suddala Chalapathi RaoView PDF

    Case Summary: CRLP/8149/2026 Court Decision: Justice Suddala Chalapathi Rao granted anticipatory bail to Accused No.3 (Dudekula Jakeer) but rejected bail for Accused Nos.1 and 2 (Nibraboina Swamy and Thupakula Srinivas). The Court found specific and substantive allegations of assault causing grievous injuries against Accused Nos.1 and 2, but no such specific allegations against Accused No.3, warranting differential treatment. Key Reasoning: While the prosecution alleged that all three accused attacked the complainant with weapons causing injuries, only Accused Nos.1 and 2 were directly implicated in causing harm. The severity of charges under Section 118(2) BNS (punishable with imprisonment exceeding seven years) justified denying bail to the principal perpetrators, whereas the lack of specific allegations against Accused No.3 supported granting conditional bail subject to regular police reporting and cooperation with investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-Jun-2026

    Interlocutory(fresh Bail Petitions)

    Suddala Chalapathi Rao

  4. 04-Jun-2026

    Interlocutory(fresh Bail Petitions)

    Suddala Chalapathi Rao

  5. 29-May-2026

    Suddala Chalapathi RaoView PDF

  6. 29-May-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 29-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRLP/8149/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRLP/8149/2026 Court Decision: Justice Suddala Chalapathi Rao granted anticipatory bail to Accused No.3 (Dudekula Jakeer) but rejected bail for Accused Nos.1 and 2 (Nibraboina Swamy and Thupakula Srinivas). The Court found specific and substantive allegations of assault causing grievous injuries against Accused Nos.1 and 2, but no such specific allegations against Accused No.3, warranting differential treatment. Key Reasoning: While the prosecution alleged that all three accused attacked the complainant with weapons causing injuries, only Accused Nos.1 and 2 were directly implicated in causing harm. The severity of charges under Section 118(2) BNS (punishable with imprisonment exceeding seven years) justified denying bail to the principal perpetrators, whereas the lack of specific allegations against Accused No.3 supported granting conditional bail subject to regular police reporting and cooperation with investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case