Mamindla Padma, vs THE STATE OF TELANGANA Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR — CRLP/8075/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED NO COSTS on 04th June 2026.
CNR: HBHC010346822026
Filing Number
CRLP/9473/2026
Filing Date
26-May-2026
Registration No
CRLP/8075/2026
Registration Date
26-May-2026
Judge
Suddala Chalapathi Rao
Coram
Suddala Chalapathi Rao
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRLP ( 41 )
Sub-Category
U/s.438 Cr.p.c Anticipatory Bail ( 61 )
Judicial Branch
CRIMINAL Section
Decision Date
04-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED NO COSTS
Last updated 05-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Mamindla Padma,
Adv. LAXMAIAH KANCHANI
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF TELANGANA Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
04-Jun-2026
Suddala Chalapathi RaoView PDF
Case Summary: CRLP/8075/2026 The Telangana High Court granted anticipatory bail to Mamindla Padma, accused of conspiracy to commit murder under Sections 61(2) and 55 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The prosecution alleged she engaged two accomplices to eliminate the complainant and his family over property disputes following her husband's death, but the court found no specific allegations against the petitioner. Considering the early investigation stage and factual circumstances, Justice Suddala Chalapathi Rao allowed the petition subject to conditions including Rs.10,000 bond with sureties, weekly police reporting for six weeks, non-interference with investigation, and witness protection. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-Jun-2026
Interlocutory(fresh Bail Petitions)
Vakiti Ramakrishna Reddy
-
29-May-2026
Vakiti Ramakrishna ReddyView PDF
-
29-May-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
26-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CRLP/8075/2026
Case Summary: CRLP/8075/2026 The Telangana High Court granted anticipatory bail to Mamindla Padma, accused of conspiracy to commit murder under Sections 61(2) and 55 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The prosecution alleged she engaged two accomplices to eliminate the complainant and his family over property disputes following her husband's death, but the court found no specific allegations against the petitioner. Considering the early investigation stage and factual circumstances, Justice Suddala Chalapathi Rao allowed the petition subject to conditions including Rs.10,000 bond with sureties, weekly police reporting for six weeks, non-interference with investigation, and witness protection. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts