Bobbala Mahender Reddy vs The State of Telangana, Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR — CRLP/8060/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED NO COSTS on 04th June 2026.
CNR: HBHC010346552026
Filing Number
CRLP/9455/2026
Filing Date
26-May-2026
Registration No
CRLP/8060/2026
Registration Date
26-May-2026
Judge
Suddala Chalapathi Rao
Coram
Suddala Chalapathi Rao
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRLP ( 41 )
Sub-Category
U/s.438 Cr.p.c Anticipatory Bail ( 61 )
Judicial Branch
CRIMINAL Section
Decision Date
04-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED NO COSTS
Last updated 05-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Bobbala Mahender Reddy
Adv. JAVED RAZACK
Respondent(s)
-
1.The State of Telangana, Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
04-Jun-2026
Suddala Chalapathi RaoView PDF
Case Summary: CRLP/8060/2026 The Telangana High Court disposed of Bobbala Mahender Reddy's pre-arrest bail petition filed under Section 482 of BNSS for charges under Sections 318(4) and 316(2) of BNS, 2023 (registered as Crime No.131/2026, Narsampet Police Station). Since the prescribed punishment was less than seven years, the court directed police to issue a notice under Section 35(3) of BNSS and conduct investigation following Supreme Court guidelines in *Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar*, rather than arresting the petitioner. The petitioner was required to cooperate with police, furnish information and documents, and comply with conditions imposed during investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-Jun-2026
Interlocutory(fresh Bail Petitions)
Vakiti Ramakrishna Reddy
-
29-May-2026
Vakiti Ramakrishna ReddyView PDF
-
29-May-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
26-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CRLP/8060/2026
Case Summary: CRLP/8060/2026 The Telangana High Court disposed of Bobbala Mahender Reddy's pre-arrest bail petition filed under Section 482 of BNSS for charges under Sections 318(4) and 316(2) of BNS, 2023 (registered as Crime No.131/2026, Narsampet Police Station). Since the prescribed punishment was less than seven years, the court directed police to issue a notice under Section 35(3) of BNSS and conduct investigation following Supreme Court guidelines in *Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar*, rather than arresting the petitioner. The petitioner was required to cooperate with police, furnish information and documents, and comply with conditions imposed during investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts