Bollam Satyanarayana, vs The State of Telangana Advocate - GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV — WP/16922/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.

Next hearing 11-Jun-2026

CNR: HBHC010346522026

Filing Number

WP/25196/2026

Filing Date

26-May-2026

Registration No

WP/16922/2026

Registration Date

26-May-2026

Judge

Nagesh Bheemapaka

Coram

Nagesh Bheemapaka

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

WP ( 28 )

Sub-Category

MISCELLANEOUS ( 50 )

Judicial Branch

WRIT Section

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Bollam Satyanarayana,

    Adv. K LAKSHMI MANOHAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of Telangana Advocate - GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV

  2. 2.The District Collector,

    Adv. GP FOR REVENUE

  3. 3.The Revenue Divisional Officer,

  4. 4.The Tahsildar,

  5. 5.The Executive Engineer,

    Adv. GP FOR ROADS BUILDINGS

  6. 6.The Deputy Executive Engineer,

  7. 7.The Gram Panchayath Jaina,

  8. 8.The Sarpanch,

Case History

  1. 11-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 11-Jun-2026

    Admission (Panchayat Raj)

    Nagesh Bheemapaka

  3. 04-Jun-2026

    Nagesh BheemapakaView PDF

    Case Summary: W.P. No. 16922/2026 On 04.06.2026, the High Court of Telangana adjourned the matter to 11.06.2026 for the respondents to file a counter affidavit. The case was not decided on merits but posted for continued proceedings. Status quo regarding the subject property was maintained until the next hearing date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 04-Jun-2026

    For Admission

    Nagesh Bheemapaka

  5. 29-May-2026

    Nagesh BheemapakaView PDF

  6. 29-May-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 26-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/16922/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: W.P. No. 16922/2026 On 04.06.2026, the High Court of Telangana adjourned the matter to 11.06.2026 for the respondents to file a counter affidavit. The case was not decided on merits but posted for continued proceedings. Status quo regarding the subject property was maintained until the next hearing date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case