Palthiya Shanker, vs The State of Telangana, Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR — CRLA/534/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 415 (2). Next hearing: 04th June 2026.

Next hearing 04-Jun-2026

CNR: HBHC010346122026

Filing Number

CRLA/9442/2026

Filing Date

26-May-2026

Registration No

CRLA/534/2026

Registration Date

26-May-2026

Judge

Vakiti Ramakrishna Reddy

Coram

Vakiti Ramakrishna Reddy

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRLA ( 40 )

Sub-Category

Conviction under N.D.P.S.Act ( 49 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL Section

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 415 (2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Palthiya Shanker,

    Adv. CH RAVINDER

  2. 2.Budidha Srikanth,

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of Telangana, Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

Case History

  1. 04-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 04-Jun-2026

    Vakiti Ramakrishna ReddyView PDF

    Case Summary: CRLA No. 534/2026 The High Court of Telangana suspended the imprisonment sentence and granted bail to petitioners Palthiya Shanker and Budidha Srikanth in their drug trafficking appeal. The petitioners were convicted of possessing 72 kgs of ganja under the NDPS Act and sentenced to 10 years rigorous imprisonment with fines. The court found the trial court violated mandatory Section 52-A procedures (sampling under magistrate supervision) during evidence collection, and considering similar precedents, deemed it appropriate to suspend the sentence pending appeal. The petitioners were enlarged on bail upon executing a Rs.50,000 bond with two sureties each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-Jun-2026

    For Admission

    Vakiti Ramakrishna Reddy

  4. 29-May-2026

    Vakiti Ramakrishna ReddyView PDF

  5. 29-May-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 26-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRLA/534/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRLA No. 534/2026 The High Court of Telangana suspended the imprisonment sentence and granted bail to petitioners Palthiya Shanker and Budidha Srikanth in their drug trafficking appeal. The petitioners were convicted of possessing 72 kgs of ganja under the NDPS Act and sentenced to 10 years rigorous imprisonment with fines. The court found the trial court violated mandatory Section 52-A procedures (sampling under magistrate supervision) during evidence collection, and considering similar precedents, deemed it appropriate to suspend the sentence pending appeal. The petitioners were enlarged on bail upon executing a Rs.50,000 bond with two sureties each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case