Putta Jahangir vs The State of Telangana Advocate - GP FOR REVENUE — WP/16857/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: 18th June 2026.

Next hearing 18-Jun-2026

CNR: HBHC010346092026

Filing Number

WP/25166/2026

Filing Date

26-May-2026

Registration No

WP/16857/2026

Registration Date

26-May-2026

Judge

Nagesh Bheemapaka

Coram

Nagesh Bheemapaka

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

WP ( 28 )

Sub-Category

PATTADAR PASS BOOKS ( 49 )

Judicial Branch

WRIT Section

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Putta Jahangir

    Adv. K KRISHNA MOHAN

  2. 2.Smt. Putta Bhagyamma

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of Telangana Advocate - GP FOR REVENUE

  2. 2.The District Collector

  3. 3.The Tahsildar

  4. 4.Jai Bhagawati Steels (P) Ltd

    Adv. VALA SRIHITHA

  5. 5.Narayanalal Baheti

    Adv. VALA SRIHITHA

  6. 6.Smt. Nathi Bai Sony

    Adv. VALA SRIHITHA

Case History

  1. 18-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 18-Jun-2026

    Admission (Revenue)

    Nagesh Bheemapaka

  3. 04-Jun-2026

    Nagesh BheemapakaView PDF

    On 04.06.2026, the Telangana High Court heard the writ petition filed by Putta Jahangir and Smt. Putta Bhagyamma against the State of Telangana and revenue officials. The court issued notice before admission and adjourned the case to 18.06.2026 for further hearing, while the Government Pleader opposed the interim application contending the prayers were identical to the main petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 04-Jun-2026

    For Admission

    Nagesh Bheemapaka

  5. 29-May-2026

    Nagesh BheemapakaView PDF

  6. 29-May-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 26-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/16857/2026

casestatus.in Summary

On 04.06.2026, the Telangana High Court heard the writ petition filed by Putta Jahangir and Smt. Putta Bhagyamma against the State of Telangana and revenue officials. The court issued notice before admission and adjourned the case to 18.06.2026 for further hearing, while the Government Pleader opposed the interim application contending the prayers were identical to the main petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case