Syed Rahmatullah Hussaini vs The State of Telangana Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR — CRLP/8087/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 480,483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED NO COSTS on 04th June 2026.
CNR: HBHC010345242026
Filing Number
CRLP/9396/2026
Filing Date
19-May-2026
Registration No
CRLP/8087/2026
Registration Date
26-May-2026
Judge
Suddala Chalapathi Rao
Coram
Suddala Chalapathi Rao
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRLP ( 41 )
Sub-Category
U/s.437 and 439 Cr.p.c Regular Bail ( 62 )
Judicial Branch
CRIMINAL Section
Decision Date
04-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED NO COSTS
Last updated 05-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Syed Rahmatullah Hussaini
Adv. V SUDHAKAR BABU
Respondent(s)
-
1.The State of Telangana Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
04-Jun-2026
Suddala Chalapathi RaoView PDF
Case Summary: CRLP/8087/2026 The Telangana High Court granted bail to Syed Rahmatullah Hussaini, accused of unlicensed possession of a knife under Section 25(1)(A) of the Arms Act, 1959. The court found that the accused had been detained since April 17, 2026, all witnesses were examined, and the material investigation was completed, justifying bail despite serious allegations involving alleged intent to harm a creditor over a Rs. 2.5 lakh debt. Bail was granted subject to executing a personal bond of Rs. 25,000 with sureties and weekly reporting to the investigating officer. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-Jun-2026
Interlocutory(fresh Bail Petitions)
Vakiti Ramakrishna Reddy
-
29-May-2026
Vakiti Ramakrishna ReddyView PDF
-
29-May-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
19-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CRLP/8087/2026
Case Summary: CRLP/8087/2026 The Telangana High Court granted bail to Syed Rahmatullah Hussaini, accused of unlicensed possession of a knife under Section 25(1)(A) of the Arms Act, 1959. The court found that the accused had been detained since April 17, 2026, all witnesses were examined, and the material investigation was completed, justifying bail despite serious allegations involving alleged intent to harm a creditor over a Rs. 2.5 lakh debt. Bail was granted subject to executing a personal bond of Rs. 25,000 with sureties and weekly reporting to the investigating officer. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts