Pasunoori Sony vs National Academy of Legal Studies and Research (NALSAR) University Advocate - GP FOR SCHOOL EDUCATION — WP/16743/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--WITHDRAWN on 15th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HBHC010343482026

Filing Number

WP/25050/2026

Filing Date

14-May-2026

Registration No

WP/16743/2026

Registration Date

14-May-2026

Judge

G.M. Mohiuddin

Coram

G.M. Mohiuddin

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

WP ( 28 )

Sub-Category

NALSAR UNIVERSITY OF LAW ( 41 )

Judicial Branch

WRIT Section

Decision Date

15-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--WITHDRAWN

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Pasunoori Sony

    Adv. B KONDA REDDY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.National Academy of Legal Studies and Research (NALSAR) University Advocate - GP FOR SCHOOL EDUCATION

  2. 2.Consortium of National Law Universities

  3. 3.State of Telangana

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-May-2026

    G.M. MohiuddinView PDF

    Case Summary: Pasunoori Sony v. NALSAR University (WP 16743/2026) The Telangana High Court dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn on 15 May 2026. The petitioner, an SC category Telangana resident student, challenged her rejection for LL.M. admission solely because she completed her LL.B. degree outside Telangana, claiming violation of Articles 14, 15, and 21. The court permitted withdrawal with liberty to file a fresh petition specifically challenging Section 5A of the NALSAR University Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-May-2026

    Admission (Universities)

    G.M. Mohiuddin

  4. 14-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/16743/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Pasunoori Sony v. NALSAR University (WP 16743/2026) The Telangana High Court dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn on 15 May 2026. The petitioner, an SC category Telangana resident student, challenged her rejection for LL.M. admission solely because she completed her LL.B. degree outside Telangana, claiming violation of Articles 14, 15, and 21. The court permitted withdrawal with liberty to file a fresh petition specifically challenging Section 5A of the NALSAR University Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case