Ashoka Sailaja Educational Society vs The State of Telangana Advocate - GP FOR HIGHER EDUCATION — WP/16729/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: 21st May 2026.
CNR: HBHC010343212026
Filing Number
WP/25023/2026
Filing Date
14-May-2026
Registration No
WP/16729/2026
Registration Date
14-May-2026
Judge
G.M. Mohiuddin
Coram
G.M. Mohiuddin
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
WP ( 28 )
Sub-Category
ADMISSION ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
WRIT Section
Last updated 01-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Ashoka Sailaja Educational Society
Adv. TARUN G. REDDY
-
2.Ashoka College of Business Management (College Code
-
3.Mr. Nomula Arjun Kumar
Respondent(s)
-
1.The State of Telangana Advocate - GP FOR HIGHER EDUCATION
-
2.The Commissioner of Collegiate Education
-
3.Telangana State Council for Higher Education (TGCHE)
-
4.The Convenor
-
5.Mahatma Gandhi University
Case History
-
21-May-2026
Next hearingPending
-
21-May-2026
Admission (Education )
G.M. Mohiuddin
-
15-May-2026
G.M. MohiuddinView PDF
-
15-May-2026
G.M. MohiuddinView PDF
Case Summary: WP/16729/2026 The Telangana High Court granted an interim direction allowing Ashoka College of Business Management and Ashoka Sailaja Educational Society to conduct independent undergraduate admissions for 2026-27 without being included in the online DOST admission process, pending final disposal of the writ petition. The court relied on precedent orders from similar cases (WP.No.10333 of 2019 and WP.No.10576 of 2019), finding no statutory change in circumstances. The order is conditional upon students being informed of the petition's pendency and the institutions publicizing the matter through media. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-May-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
14-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/16729/2026
Case Summary: WP/16729/2026 The Telangana High Court granted an interim direction allowing Ashoka College of Business Management and Ashoka Sailaja Educational Society to conduct independent undergraduate admissions for 2026-27 without being included in the online DOST admission process, pending final disposal of the writ petition. The court relied on precedent orders from similar cases (WP.No.10333 of 2019 and WP.No.10576 of 2019), finding no statutory change in circumstances. The order is conditional upon students being informed of the petition's pendency and the institutions publicizing the matter through media. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts