Telugu Anjanna vs State of Telangana Advocate - THE ADVOCATE GENERAL — WA/537/2026

Case under Letters Patent, 1866 Section 15. Next hearing: 10th June 2026.

CNR: HBHC010343112026

Next Hearing

10th June 2026

Filing Number

WA/25013/2026

Filing Date

14-05-2026

Registration No

WA/537/2026

Registration Date

14-05-2026

Judge

T.MADHAVI DEVI , G.M. MOHIUDDIN

Coram

T.MADHAVI DEVI , G.M. MOHIUDDIN

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

WA ( 27 )

Sub-Category

LAND ACQUISITION ( 26 )

Judicial Branch

WRIT Section

Acts & Sections

Letters Patent, 1866 Section 15

Petitioner(s)

Telugu Anjanna

Adv. CH RAVI KUMAR

Dandu Ramul

Boini Sanganna

Sheik Younus

Dudekula Khairath ali

Telugu Narayana

Peddadoddi Monappa

Molla Makbool miya

Sirigepally Anjamma

Peddadoddi Shivamma

Telugu Ashok

Maturu Nagamma

Machukuri Bichappa

Molla Maqbool Miya

Rejinthal Mittappa

Sheik Rubeena Begum

Rejinthal Narsimulu

Patlolla Chenchu Laxmi

Gaddamidi Narsimulu

Patlolla Narsimulu

Boini Kistanna

Telugu Sujatha

Telugu Manenna

Chakali Pentanna

Chakali Naresh

Dandu Manemma

Chakali Punyamma

Baikattu Raju

Chakali Anjanna

Telugu Narsimulu

Molla Imtiyaz

Molla Kousar Begum

Chakali Sanganna

Molla Mumtiyaz

Abdul Raheman

Chakali Raju

Chakali Vittal

Chilepally Dathu

Molla Jarina Begum

Machukuri Manenna

Machukuri Narayana

Boini Narsimulu

Machukuri Thirthamma

Boini Mallanna

Machukuri Narsamma

Boini Rukkamma

Thalari Narsamma

Chakali Maneppa

Kammari Mahesh

Kammari Gnaneshwar

Kammari Vijayalaxmi

Kammari Vishnu Vardhan

Rejinthal Chandramma

Kannapuram Narsamma

Earra Agamaiah

Chakali Ramesh

Chakali Satyamma

Telugu Subash

Chakali Sanganna

Chakali Ramchander

Peddagolla Laxmi

Peddagolla Narsamma

Peddagolla Yellanna

Chakali Earanna

Khanapuram Ittamma

Chakali Narayanna

Dandu Anjanna

Peddagolla Padma

Molla. Jani Miya

Gaddamiddi Kiran

Chakali Narsimulu

Molla Khadeer

Kammari Dathathri

Kammari Narayanna

Kammari Jarnamma

Telugu Paramma

Mucharla Sheshu, Padmanaba rao

Machukuri Kavitha

Machukuri Vittamma

Telugu Sandip Kumar

Telugu Satyamma

Telugu Santhosh

Molla Babu Miya

Molla Firoz Miya

Telugu Sanganna

Telugu Laxmanna

Mungi George

Molla Nawab

Machukuri Shivanna

Machukuri

Erra Pentappa

Machukuri Naresh

Telugu Srinivas

Molla Hamida Bee

Telugu Ramchander

Telugu Mamatha

Molla Husin Sab

Pathabai Vittal

Molla Khalil Miya

Molla Naseema Begum,

Molla Muskan Begum

Molla Niha Bee

Molla Tasleem

Respondent(s)

State of Telangana Advocate - THE ADVOCATE GENERAL

State of Telangana

Commissioner

District Collector

Additional Collector cum

Special Deputy Collector

Mandal Tahsildar

Telangana State Industrial Infrastructure Corporation (TGIIC)

Adv. M SRIKANTH REDDY (SC FOR TGIIC)

Hearing History

Judge: T.MADHAVI DEVI , G.M. MOHIUDDIN

15-05-2026

FOR ADMISSION

10-06-2026

FOR ADMISSION

Orders

15-05-2026
T.MADHAVI DEVI,G.M. MOHIUDDIN

Case Summary: WA No. 537 of 2026 Outcome: The High Court allowed the writ appeal partially, directing respondents not to interfere with the petitioners' harvesting of standing crops for one month. The court permitted continued cultivation of subject lands under acquisition while listing the original writ petition (WP No. 14026 of 2026) for final disposal before the Single Judge on 10.06.2026. Key Issue: 103 agriculturalists from Yelgoi village challenged land acquisition proceedings for an industrial project, citing defects in the acquisition process and seeking protection for standing crops. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WA No. 537 of 2026 Outcome: The High Court allowed the writ appeal partially, directing respondents not to interfere with the petitioners' harvesting of standing crops for one month. The court permitted continued cultivation of subject lands under acquisition while listing the original writ petition (WP No. 14026 of 2026) for final disposal before the Single Judge on 10.06.2026. Key Issue: 103 agriculturalists from Yelgoi village challenged land acquisition proceedings for an industrial project, citing defects in the acquisition process and seeking protection for standing crops. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case