Telugu Anjanna vs State of Telangana Advocate - THE ADVOCATE GENERAL — WA/537/2026

Case under Letters Patent, 1866 Section 15. Status: For Admission. Next hearing: 10th June 2026.

For Admission Next hearing 10-Jun-2026 this date has passed

CNR: HBHC010343112026

Filing Number

WA/25013/2026

Filing Date

14-May-2026

Registration No

WA/537/2026

Registration Date

14-May-2026

Judge

T.madhavi Devi , G.M. Mohiuddin

Coram

T.madhavi Devi , G.M. Mohiuddin

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

WA ( 27 )

Sub-Category

LAND ACQUISITION ( 26 )

Judicial Branch

WRIT Section

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Letters Patent, 1866 Section 15

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Telugu Anjanna

    Adv. CH RAVI KUMAR

  2. 2.Dandu Ramul

  3. 3.Boini Sanganna

  4. 4.Sheik Younus

  5. 5.Dudekula Khairath ali

  6. 6.Telugu Narayana

  7. 7.Peddadoddi Monappa

  8. 8.Molla Makbool miya

  9. 9.Sirigepally Anjamma

  10. 10.Peddadoddi Shivamma

  11. 11.Telugu Ashok

  12. 12.Maturu Nagamma

  13. 13.Machukuri Bichappa

  14. 14.Molla Maqbool Miya

  15. 15.Rejinthal Mittappa

  16. 16.Sheik Rubeena Begum

  17. 17.Rejinthal Narsimulu

  18. 18.Patlolla Chenchu Laxmi

  19. 19.Gaddamidi Narsimulu

  20. 20.Patlolla Narsimulu

  21. 21.Boini Kistanna

  22. 22.Telugu Sujatha

  23. 23.Telugu Manenna

  24. 24.Chakali Pentanna

  25. 25.Chakali Naresh

  26. 26.Dandu Manemma

  27. 27.Chakali Punyamma

  28. 28.Baikattu Raju

  29. 29.Chakali Anjanna

  30. 30.Telugu Narsimulu

  31. 31.Molla Imtiyaz

  32. 32.Molla Kousar Begum

  33. 33.Chakali Sanganna

  34. 34.Molla Mumtiyaz

  35. 35.Abdul Raheman

  36. 36.Chakali Raju

  37. 37.Chakali Vittal

  38. 38.Chilepally Dathu

  39. 39.Molla Jarina Begum

  40. 40.Machukuri Manenna

  41. 41.Machukuri Narayana

  42. 42.Boini Narsimulu

  43. 43.Machukuri Thirthamma

  44. 44.Boini Mallanna

  45. 45.Machukuri Narsamma

  46. 46.Boini Rukkamma

  47. 47.Thalari Narsamma

  48. 48.Chakali Maneppa

  49. 49.Kammari Mahesh

  50. 50.Kammari Gnaneshwar

  51. 51.Kammari Vijayalaxmi

  52. 52.Kammari Vishnu Vardhan

  53. 53.Rejinthal Chandramma

  54. 54.Kannapuram Narsamma

  55. 55.Earra Agamaiah

  56. 56.Chakali Ramesh

  57. 57.Chakali Satyamma

  58. 58.Telugu Subash

  59. 59.Chakali Sanganna

  60. 60.Chakali Ramchander

  61. 61.Peddagolla Laxmi

  62. 62.Peddagolla Narsamma

  63. 63.Peddagolla Yellanna

  64. 64.Chakali Earanna

  65. 65.Khanapuram Ittamma

  66. 66.Chakali Narayanna

  67. 67.Dandu Anjanna

  68. 68.Peddagolla Padma

  69. 69.Molla. Jani Miya

  70. 70.Gaddamiddi Kiran

  71. 71.Chakali Narsimulu

  72. 72.Molla Khadeer

  73. 73.Kammari Dathathri

  74. 74.Kammari Narayanna

  75. 75.Kammari Jarnamma

  76. 76.Telugu Paramma

  77. 77.Mucharla Sheshu, Padmanaba rao

  78. 78.Machukuri Kavitha

  79. 79.Machukuri Vittamma

  80. 80.Telugu Sandip Kumar

  81. 81.Telugu Satyamma

  82. 82.Telugu Santhosh

  83. 83.Molla Babu Miya

  84. 84.Molla Firoz Miya

  85. 85.Telugu Sanganna

  86. 86.Telugu Laxmanna

  87. 87.Mungi George

  88. 88.Molla Nawab

  89. 89.Machukuri Shivanna

  90. 90.Machukuri

  91. 91.Erra Pentappa

  92. 92.Machukuri Naresh

  93. 93.Telugu Srinivas

  94. 94.Molla Hamida Bee

  95. 95.Telugu Ramchander

  96. 96.Telugu Mamatha

  97. 97.Molla Husin Sab

  98. 98.Pathabai Vittal

  99. 99.Molla Khalil Miya

  100. 100.Molla Naseema Begum,

  101. 101.Molla Muskan Begum

  102. 102.Molla Niha Bee

  103. 103.Molla Tasleem

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Telangana Advocate - THE ADVOCATE GENERAL

  2. 2.State of Telangana

  3. 3.Commissioner

  4. 4.District Collector

  5. 5.Additional Collector cum

  6. 6.Special Deputy Collector

  7. 7.Mandal Tahsildar

  8. 8.Telangana State Industrial Infrastructure Corporation (TGIIC)

    Adv. M SRIKANTH REDDY (SC FOR TGIIC)

Case History

  1. 10-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 10-Jun-2026

    For Admission

    T.madhavi Devi , G.M. Mohiuddin

  3. 15-May-2026

    T.madhavi Devi,g.m. MohiuddinView PDF

    Case Summary: WA No. 537 of 2026 Outcome: The High Court allowed the writ appeal partially, directing respondents not to interfere with the petitioners' harvesting of standing crops for one month. The court permitted continued cultivation of subject lands under acquisition while listing the original writ petition (WP No. 14026 of 2026) for final disposal before the Single Judge on 10.06.2026. Key Issue: 103 agriculturalists from Yelgoi village challenged land acquisition proceedings for an industrial project, citing defects in the acquisition process and seeking protection for standing crops. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 15-May-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 14-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WA/537/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WA No. 537 of 2026 Outcome: The High Court allowed the writ appeal partially, directing respondents not to interfere with the petitioners' harvesting of standing crops for one month. The court permitted continued cultivation of subject lands under acquisition while listing the original writ petition (WP No. 14026 of 2026) for final disposal before the Single Judge on 10.06.2026. Key Issue: 103 agriculturalists from Yelgoi village challenged land acquisition proceedings for an industrial project, citing defects in the acquisition process and seeking protection for standing crops. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case