MOHAMMED ARSHAD ALI vs The Inspector of Police — WP/16719/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: 22nd June 2026.

Next hearing 22-Jun-2026

CNR: HBHC010343092026

Filing Number

WP/25011/2026

Filing Date

14-May-2026

Registration No

WP/16719/2026

Registration Date

14-May-2026

Judge

G.M. Mohiuddin

Coram

G.M. Mohiuddin

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

WP ( 28 )

Sub-Category

NOT TO INTERFERE IN CIVIL DISPUTES ( 19 )

Judicial Branch

WRIT Section

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MOHAMMED ARSHAD ALI

    Adv. LARAIB ABU TOUF

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The Inspector of Police

  2. 2.Syed Ameer Ali

  3. 3.Ashraf Ali

  4. 4.The State of Telangana

    Adv. GP FOR HOME

Case History

  1. 22-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 22-Jun-2026

    Admission (Home)

    G.M. Mohiuddin

  3. 15-May-2026

    G.M. MohiuddinView PDF

    Case Summary: WP/16719/2026 Mohammed Arshad Ali sought a Writ of Mandamus to prevent police interference with his property at Chandulal Baradari, Hyderabad, in a civil dispute with Syed Ameer Ali and Ashraf Ali. The High Court of Telangana issued a "Show Cause Notice Before Admission" on 15 May 2026, directing respondents to show cause by 22 June 2026 why the petition should not be admitted. The police argued any property visits were solely for criminal investigation purposes, not civil interference. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 15-May-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 14-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/16719/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP/16719/2026 Mohammed Arshad Ali sought a Writ of Mandamus to prevent police interference with his property at Chandulal Baradari, Hyderabad, in a civil dispute with Syed Ameer Ali and Ashraf Ali. The High Court of Telangana issued a "Show Cause Notice Before Admission" on 15 May 2026, directing respondents to show cause by 22 June 2026 why the petition should not be admitted. The police argued any property visits were solely for criminal investigation purposes, not civil interference. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case