Prattipati Prem Chandu vs The State of Telangana Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR — CRLP/7918/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF NO COSTS on 21st May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HBHC010342972026

Filing Number

CRLP/9290/2026

Filing Date

14-May-2026

Registration No

CRLP/7918/2026

Registration Date

14-May-2026

Judge

E.V. Venugopal

Coram

E.V. Venugopal

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRLP ( 41 )

Sub-Category

U/s.438 Cr.p.c Anticipatory Bail ( 61 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL Section

Decision Date

21-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OF NO COSTS

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Prattipati Prem Chandu

    Adv. PRUDHVI RAJ MUDUNURI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of Telangana Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 29-May-2026

    E.V. VenugopalView PDF

    The Telangana High Court granted pre-arrest bail to Prattipati Prem Chandu, who was accused of offenses under Section 305(b) BNS (abetment of suicide) in FIR 1642/2025. The court directed the petitioner to appear before the Investigating Officer by June 1, 2026, and required the IO to follow BNSS Section 35(3) procedures and *Arnesh Kumar* Supreme Court guidelines, while requiring the accused's cooperation and document production for investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 21-May-2026

    Fresh Bail Petitions

    E.V. Venugopal

  4. 15-May-2026

    E.V. VenugopalView PDF

  5. 15-May-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 14-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRLP/7918/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Telangana High Court granted pre-arrest bail to Prattipati Prem Chandu, who was accused of offenses under Section 305(b) BNS (abetment of suicide) in FIR 1642/2025. The court directed the petitioner to appear before the Investigating Officer by June 1, 2026, and required the IO to follow BNSS Section 35(3) procedures and *Arnesh Kumar* Supreme Court guidelines, while requiring the accused's cooperation and document production for investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case