Goundra Paramesh alias Ingammolla Paramesh vs The State of Telangana, Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR — CRLP/7923/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF NO COSTS on 15th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HBHC010342912026

Filing Number

CRLP/9287/2026

Filing Date

14-May-2026

Registration No

CRLP/7923/2026

Registration Date

14-May-2026

Judge

E.V. Venugopal

Coram

E.V. Venugopal

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRLP ( 41 )

Sub-Category

U/s.438 Cr.p.c Anticipatory Bail ( 61 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL Section

Decision Date

15-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OF NO COSTS

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Goundra Paramesh alias Ingammolla Paramesh

    Adv. MANDRU SAMBASIVA RAO

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of Telangana, Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

  2. 2.Goundra Santosha

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-May-2026

    E.V. VenugopalView PDF

    Summary of CRLP/7923/2026: The Telangana High Court granted conditional relief to Goundra Paramesh in his pre-arrest bail petition for Crime No. 183 of 2026 involving offences under Sections 85, 115(2) BNS, and Sections 3-4 DPA. Without examining merits, the court directed the petitioner to appear before the Investigating Officer by May 26, 2026, and mandated the officer to follow Section 35(3) BNSS procedures and Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar guidelines. The petition was disposed with conditions requiring the petitioner's cooperation in investigation and document production. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-May-2026

    Fresh Bail Petitions

    E.V. Venugopal

  4. 14-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRLP/7923/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of CRLP/7923/2026: The Telangana High Court granted conditional relief to Goundra Paramesh in his pre-arrest bail petition for Crime No. 183 of 2026 involving offences under Sections 85, 115(2) BNS, and Sections 3-4 DPA. Without examining merits, the court directed the petitioner to appear before the Investigating Officer by May 26, 2026, and mandated the officer to follow Section 35(3) BNSS procedures and Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar guidelines. The petition was disposed with conditions requiring the petitioner's cooperation in investigation and document production. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case