Naikoti Sravan vs The State of Telangana, Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR — CRLP/7902/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 480&483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED NO COSTS on 15th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 14-May-2026

CNR: HBHC010342802026

Filing Number

CRLP/9279/2026

Filing Date

14-May-2026

Registration No

CRLP/7902/2026

Registration Date

14-May-2026

Judge

T.madhavi Devi

Coram

T.madhavi Devi

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRLP ( 41 )

Sub-Category

U/s.437 and 439 Cr.p.c Regular Bail ( 62 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL Section

Decision Date

15-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED NO COSTS

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 480&483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Naikoti Sravan

    Adv. NAMBI KRISHNA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of Telangana, Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-May-2026

    T.madhavi DeviView PDF

    Summary of CRLP/7902/2026: The Telangana High Court granted bail to Naikoti Sravan, accused under Section 69 of the BNS (2023) in a case involving alleged deception regarding marriage followed by sexual relations. The court found that since the complainant (aged 24) and accused were in a consensual relationship and the complainant was a mature adult capable of making her own decisions, the accused alone could not be held liable for consensual acts, which remain subject to trial. Bail was granted on a personal bond of Rs. 20,000 with two sureties and standard bail conditions under BNSS Section 480(3). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-May-2026

    Interlocutory(fresh Bail Petitions)

  4. 14-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRLP/7902/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of CRLP/7902/2026: The Telangana High Court granted bail to Naikoti Sravan, accused under Section 69 of the BNS (2023) in a case involving alleged deception regarding marriage followed by sexual relations. The court found that since the complainant (aged 24) and accused were in a consensual relationship and the complainant was a mature adult capable of making her own decisions, the accused alone could not be held liable for consensual acts, which remain subject to trial. Bail was granted on a personal bond of Rs. 20,000 with two sureties and standard bail conditions under BNSS Section 480(3). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case