M/s Vishal Prakruthi Resorts vs The State of Telangana Advocate - GP FOR MCPL ADMN URBAN DEV — WP/16693/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: 18th June 2026.
CNR: HBHC010342432026
Filing Number
WP/24975/2026
Filing Date
14-May-2026
Registration No
WP/16693/2026
Registration Date
14-May-2026
Judge
T.madhavi Devi
Coram
T.madhavi Devi
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
WP ( 28 )
Sub-Category
NOT TO DEMOLISH BUILDING ( 72 )
Judicial Branch
WRIT Section
Last updated 01-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.M/s Vishal Prakruthi Resorts
Adv. KATIKA RAVINDER REDDY
Respondent(s)
-
1.The State of Telangana Advocate - GP FOR MCPL ADMN URBAN DEV
-
2.Gummadidala Municipality
Case History
-
18-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
18-Jun-2026
Admission (Municipal Admn.)
T.madhavi Devi
-
15-May-2026
T.madhavi DeviView PDF
-
15-May-2026
T.madhavi DeviView PDF
Summary of WP/16693/2026 and Related Cases Vishal Prakruthi Resorts challenged four municipal demolition orders (dated 16.12.2025) issued by Gummadidala Municipality against their property (H.No.6-87/9, Annaram Village) executed on 12.05.2026, claiming the demolitions violated the Telangana Municipalities Act 2019 and constitutional rights. The High Court admitted the petitions, granted status quo (maintaining current position), and adjourned the matter to 18.06.2026 for further hearing, effectively staying any further demolition action pending final adjudication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-May-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
14-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/16693/2026
Summary of WP/16693/2026 and Related Cases Vishal Prakruthi Resorts challenged four municipal demolition orders (dated 16.12.2025) issued by Gummadidala Municipality against their property (H.No.6-87/9, Annaram Village) executed on 12.05.2026, claiming the demolitions violated the Telangana Municipalities Act 2019 and constitutional rights. The High Court admitted the petitions, granted status quo (maintaining current position), and adjourned the matter to 18.06.2026 for further hearing, effectively staying any further demolition action pending final adjudication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts