Rathna Naresh, vs The State of Telangana, Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR — CRLP/7890/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED NO COSTS on 15th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HBHC010342352026

Filing Number

CRLP/9260/2026

Filing Date

14-May-2026

Registration No

CRLP/7890/2026

Registration Date

14-May-2026

Judge

T.madhavi Devi

Coram

T.madhavi Devi

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRLP ( 41 )

Sub-Category

U/s.438 Cr.p.c Anticipatory Bail ( 61 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL Section

Decision Date

15-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED NO COSTS

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Rathna Naresh,

    Adv. PALLE SRIHARINATH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of Telangana, Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-May-2026

    T.madhavi DeviView PDF

    Case Summary: CRLP/7890/2026 The Telangana High Court granted pre-arrest bail to Rathna Naresh, a Data Entry Operator accused of misappropriating Rs. 12.5 lakh in public funds through record manipulation and fake beneficiaries. Justice T. Madhavi Devi allowed the petition, finding that while serious allegations existed, the petitioner's permanent residency and lack of absconding risk warranted bail with stringent conditions including surrender within two weeks, Rs. 25,000 personal bond with sureties, weekly investigation cooperation, and restricted movement within Sangareddy District. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-May-2026

    Fresh Bail Petitions

    T.madhavi Devi

  4. 14-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRLP/7890/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRLP/7890/2026 The Telangana High Court granted pre-arrest bail to Rathna Naresh, a Data Entry Operator accused of misappropriating Rs. 12.5 lakh in public funds through record manipulation and fake beneficiaries. Justice T. Madhavi Devi allowed the petition, finding that while serious allegations existed, the petitioner's permanent residency and lack of absconding risk warranted bail with stringent conditions including surrender within two weeks, Rs. 25,000 personal bond with sureties, weekly investigation cooperation, and restricted movement within Sangareddy District. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case