P MALLIKARJUNA KUMAR vs The State of Telangana Advocate - GP FOR REVENUE — WP/16688/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: 25th June 2026.

Next hearing 25-Jun-2026

CNR: HBHC010342292026

Filing Number

WP/24968/2026

Filing Date

12-May-2026

Registration No

WP/16688/2026

Registration Date

12-May-2026

Judge

G.M. Mohiuddin

Coram

G.M. Mohiuddin

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

WP ( 28 )

Sub-Category

NOT TO INTERFERE WITH PEACEFUL POSSESSION ( 85 )

Judicial Branch

WRIT Section

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.P MALLIKARJUNA KUMAR

    Adv. PILLIX LAW FIRM

  2. 2.Sree Tirumala Metal Industry

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of Telangana Advocate - GP FOR REVENUE

  2. 2.The District Collector

  3. 3.The Tahsildar

  4. 4.Revenue Divisional Officer

  5. 5.The Commissioner

Case History

  1. 25-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 25-Jun-2026

    Admission (Revenue)

    G.M. Mohiuddin

  3. 14-May-2026

    G.M. MohiuddinView PDF

    Case Summary: WP 16688/2026 The Telangana High Court adjourned the petition filed by P Mallikarjuna Kumar and Sree Tirumala Metal Industry challenging the demolition of their crusher units on May 9, 2026. Both parties submitted undertakings: the petitioner committed not to undertake illegal stone crushing, while HYDRAA (Respondent No.5) committed not to interfere with the petitioner's peaceful possession of the property. The court granted the respondents six weeks to file counter-affidavits and listed the case for June 25, 2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 14-May-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 12-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/16688/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP 16688/2026 The Telangana High Court adjourned the petition filed by P Mallikarjuna Kumar and Sree Tirumala Metal Industry challenging the demolition of their crusher units on May 9, 2026. Both parties submitted undertakings: the petitioner committed not to undertake illegal stone crushing, while HYDRAA (Respondent No.5) committed not to interfere with the petitioner's peaceful possession of the property. The court granted the respondents six weeks to file counter-affidavits and listed the case for June 25, 2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case