Hymavati Dasari vs Union of India Advocate - N BHUJANGA RAO Deputy Solicitor General of India — WP/16684/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.

Next hearing 17-Jun-2026

CNR: HBHC010341712026

Filing Number

WP/24953/2026

Filing Date

12-May-2026

Registration No

WP/16684/2026

Registration Date

12-May-2026

Judge

G.M. Mohiuddin

Coram

G.M. Mohiuddin

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

WP ( 28 )

Sub-Category

TO FOLLOW RBI GUIDELINES ( 16 )

Judicial Branch

WRIT Section

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Hymavati Dasari

    Adv. M KESHAV YADAV

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Union of India Advocate - N BHUJANGA RAO Deputy Solicitor General of India

  2. 2.Reserve Bank of India (RBI)

  3. 3.HDFC Bank Ltd

  4. 4.L and T Finance Limited

  5. 5.IDFC FIRST BANK LIMITED

  6. 6.SMFG India Credit Company Ltd

  7. 7.Epimoney Private Limited

Case History

  1. 17-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 17-Jun-2026

    Admission (Central Govt.)

    G.M. Mohiuddin

  3. 14-May-2026

    G.M. MohiuddinView PDF

    Case Summary: WP/16684/2026 Outcome: The High Court of Telangana issued a show cause notice to respondents (RBI and financial institutions) to explain why the writ petition should not be admitted. The petition, challenging alleged illegal loan recovery practices violating RBI Circular dated 12.08.2022 and constitutional rights under Articles 14, 19, and 21, was admitted for hearing. The court directed respondents to strictly adhere to RBI guidelines during recovery proceedings and listed the case for 17.06.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 14-May-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 12-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/16684/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP/16684/2026 Outcome: The High Court of Telangana issued a show cause notice to respondents (RBI and financial institutions) to explain why the writ petition should not be admitted. The petition, challenging alleged illegal loan recovery practices violating RBI Circular dated 12.08.2022 and constitutional rights under Articles 14, 19, and 21, was admitted for hearing. The court directed respondents to strictly adhere to RBI guidelines during recovery proceedings and listed the case for 17.06.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case