Mohammed Jameeluddin vs Union of India Advocate - N BHUJANGA RAO Deputy Solicitor General of India — WP/16671/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.
CNR: HBHC010341702026
Filing Number
WP/24952/2026
Filing Date
12-May-2026
Registration No
WP/16671/2026
Registration Date
12-May-2026
Judge
G.M. Mohiuddin
Coram
G.M. Mohiuddin
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
WP ( 28 )
Sub-Category
TO FOLLOW RBI GUIDELINES ( 16 )
Judicial Branch
WRIT Section
Last updated 01-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Mohammed Jameeluddin
Adv. M KESHAV YADAV
Respondent(s)
-
1.Union of India Advocate - N BHUJANGA RAO Deputy Solicitor General of India
-
2.Reserve Bank of India (RBI)
-
3.HDFC Bank Ltd
-
4.Union bank of india
-
5.Branch International Financial Services Pvt Ltd
-
6.FINC friends Pvt Ltd
-
7.RK Bansal finance pvt ltd
-
8.North East Hire Purchase Co India Pvt Ltd
Case History
-
17-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
17-Jun-2026
Admission (Central Govt.)
G.M. Mohiuddin
-
14-May-2026
G.M. MohiuddinView PDF
CASE SUMMARY: WP/16671/2026 - Mohammed Jameeluddin v. Union of India The High Court of Telangana issued notice to respondents (RBI, HDFC Bank, Union Bank, and other finance companies) to show cause why the writ petition should not be admitted. The petitioner challenges unlawful loan recovery practices violating RBI Circular No. RBl/2022-231108 dated 12.08.2022 and constitutional rights under Articles 14, 19, and 21. The Court directed respondents' recovery agents to strictly follow RBI guidelines and Supreme Court judgments. The case is adjourned for hearing to 17.06.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-May-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
12-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/16671/2026
CASE SUMMARY: WP/16671/2026 - Mohammed Jameeluddin v. Union of India The High Court of Telangana issued notice to respondents (RBI, HDFC Bank, Union Bank, and other finance companies) to show cause why the writ petition should not be admitted. The petitioner challenges unlawful loan recovery practices violating RBI Circular No. RBl/2022-231108 dated 12.08.2022 and constitutional rights under Articles 14, 19, and 21. The Court directed respondents' recovery agents to strictly follow RBI guidelines and Supreme Court judgments. The case is adjourned for hearing to 17.06.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts