Mutyala Venkatamma vs The State of Telangana Advocate - GP FOR REVENUE — WP/16654/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF NO COSTS on 14th May 2026.
CNR: HBHC010341202026
Filing Number
WP/24932/2026
Filing Date
12-May-2026
Registration No
WP/16654/2026
Registration Date
12-May-2026
Judge
G.M. Mohiuddin
Coram
G.M. Mohiuddin
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
WP ( 28 )
Sub-Category
DISPOSSESSION ( 11 )
Judicial Branch
WRIT Section
Decision Date
14-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OF NO COSTS
Last updated 01-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Mutyala Venkatamma
Adv. PRAVEEN KUMAR VEERJALA
Respondent(s)
-
1.The State of Telangana Advocate - GP FOR REVENUE
-
2.The District Collector
-
3.The Revenue Division Officer
-
4.The Tahasildar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-May-2026
G.M. MohiuddinView PDF
Case Summary: WP 16654/2026 - Mutyala Venkatamma v. State of Telangana The Telangana High Court disposed of a writ petition challenging the Tahasildar's order deleting the petitioner's land entry (3 acres in Survey No. 657/A/2) from revenue records. The court found the impugned order dated 04.05.2026 contained procedural irregularities as it failed to adequately address documentary evidence submitted by the petitioner. However, rather than quashing the order, the court directed the petitioner to appeal to the Revenue Divisional Officer under the statutory remedy available under Section 4(1)b of the Telangana Assigned Lands Act, 1977, with status quo maintained pending appeal disposal within 60 days. The petitioner must file the appeal within two weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-May-2026
Admission (Revenue)
G.M. Mohiuddin
-
12-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/16654/2026
Case Summary: WP 16654/2026 - Mutyala Venkatamma v. State of Telangana The Telangana High Court disposed of a writ petition challenging the Tahasildar's order deleting the petitioner's land entry (3 acres in Survey No. 657/A/2) from revenue records. The court found the impugned order dated 04.05.2026 contained procedural irregularities as it failed to adequately address documentary evidence submitted by the petitioner. However, rather than quashing the order, the court directed the petitioner to appeal to the Revenue Divisional Officer under the statutory remedy available under Section 4(1)b of the Telangana Assigned Lands Act, 1977, with status quo maintained pending appeal disposal within 60 days. The petitioner must file the appeal within two weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts