A. Sumalatha vs The State of Telangana Advocate - GP FOR REVENUE — WP/16644/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.

Next hearing 15-Jun-2026

CNR: HBHC010341072026

Filing Number

WP/24926/2026

Filing Date

12-May-2026

Registration No

WP/16644/2026

Registration Date

12-May-2026

Judge

G.M. Mohiuddin

Coram

G.M. Mohiuddin

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

WP ( 28 )

Sub-Category

NOT TO INTERFERE WITH PEACEFUL POSSESSION ( 85 )

Judicial Branch

WRIT Section

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.A. Sumalatha

    Adv. R MANGULAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of Telangana Advocate - GP FOR REVENUE

  2. 2.The District Collector

  3. 3.The Revenue Divisional Officer

  4. 4.The Tahsildar

  5. 5.The Forest Range Officer

    Adv. GP FOR FORESTS

Case History

  1. 15-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 15-Jun-2026

    Admission (Revenue)

    G.M. Mohiuddin

  3. 14-May-2026

    G.M. MohiuddinView PDF

    Case Summary: In WP No. 16644/2026, petitioner A. Sumalatha challenged the interference of Revenue and Forest Department officials in her possession of 4.00 guntas of land (Sy. No. 853/1) at Bheemarama, Mancherial District, which she held under a valid patta certificate since 2010. The High Court granted a status quo order, directing that possession remain unchanged pending further hearing on 15.06.2026, while clarifying that the petitioner cannot encroach into Reserve Forest land. The respondents were permitted to file their counter-affidavits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 14-May-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 12-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/16644/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: In WP No. 16644/2026, petitioner A. Sumalatha challenged the interference of Revenue and Forest Department officials in her possession of 4.00 guntas of land (Sy. No. 853/1) at Bheemarama, Mancherial District, which she held under a valid patta certificate since 2010. The High Court granted a status quo order, directing that possession remain unchanged pending further hearing on 15.06.2026, while clarifying that the petitioner cannot encroach into Reserve Forest land. The respondents were permitted to file their counter-affidavits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case