M/s. Pets Care Super Speciality Hospital vs The State of Telangana Advocate - GP FOR MCPL ADMN URBAN DEV — WP/16656/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--WITHDRAWN on 14th May 2026.
CNR: HBHC010340892026
Filing Number
WP/24918/2026
Filing Date
12-May-2026
Registration No
WP/16656/2026
Registration Date
12-May-2026
Judge
T.madhavi Devi
Coram
T.madhavi Devi
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
WP ( 28 )
Sub-Category
MUNCIPAL CORPORATION OF HYDERABAD ( 25 )
Judicial Branch
WRIT Section
Decision Date
14-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--WITHDRAWN
Last updated 01-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.M/s. Pets Care Super Speciality Hospital
Adv. RUSHEEK REDDY K V
Respondent(s)
-
1.The State of Telangana Advocate - GP FOR MCPL ADMN URBAN DEV
-
2.Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Represented by its Commissioner
-
3.Directorate of Enforcement Vigilance and Disaster Management Vigilance Wing
-
4.Cyberabad Municipal Corporation
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-May-2026
T.madhavi DeviView PDF
The Telangana High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by Pets Care Super Speciality Hospital as withdrawn on May 14, 2026. The hospital had challenged the seizure of its premises on May 8, 2026, and cancellation of its trade license by Cyberabad Municipal Corporation without notice or hearing, alleging violations of natural justice and fundamental rights. The court granted the petitioner liberty to re-approach the court if the hospital was not de-seized by respondents, and dismissed the petition without costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-May-2026
Admission (Municipal Admn.)
T.madhavi Devi
-
12-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/16656/2026
The Telangana High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by Pets Care Super Speciality Hospital as withdrawn on May 14, 2026. The hospital had challenged the seizure of its premises on May 8, 2026, and cancellation of its trade license by Cyberabad Municipal Corporation without notice or hearing, alleging violations of natural justice and fundamental rights. The court granted the petitioner liberty to re-approach the court if the hospital was not de-seized by respondents, and dismissed the petition without costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts