M/s. Arka Business Solutions vs Union of India Advocate - N BHUJANGA RAO Deputy Solicitor General of India — WP/16633/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED NO COSTS on 14th May 2026.
CNR: HBHC010340652026
Filing Number
WP/24903/2026
Filing Date
12-May-2026
Registration No
WP/16633/2026
Registration Date
12-May-2026
Judge
T.madhavi Devi , G.M. Mohiuddin
Coram
T.madhavi Devi , G.M. Mohiuddin
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
WP ( 28 )
Sub-Category
SEIZURE OF GGODS ( 5 )
Judicial Branch
WRIT Section
Decision Date
14-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED NO COSTS
Last updated 01-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.M/s. Arka Business Solutions
Adv. KARTHIK RAMANA PUTTAMREDDY
Respondent(s)
-
1.Union of India Advocate - N BHUJANGA RAO Deputy Solicitor General of India
-
2.Joint Commissioner of Customs (Imports)
Adv. DOMINIC FERNANDES (senior standing counsel for CBIC)
-
3.Deputy Commissioner of Customs
-
4.Superintendent of Customs (ICD-Thimmapur)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-May-2026
T.madhavi Devi,g.m. MohiuddinView PDF
Case Summary: WP/16633/2026 - M/s. Arka Business Solutions v. Union of India The Telangana High Court allowed Arka Business Solutions' writ petition challenging the seizure of 96 multi-function devices by customs authorities. The court conditionally released the goods upon payment of enhanced duty within specified timelines, with the petitioner also required to provide a 10% bank guarantee and maintain transaction records. Importantly, the court clarified that customs authorities retain full rights to proceed with adjudication proceedings independently. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-May-2026
For Admission
T.madhavi Devi , G.M. Mohiuddin
-
12-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/16633/2026
Case Summary: WP/16633/2026 - M/s. Arka Business Solutions v. Union of India The Telangana High Court allowed Arka Business Solutions' writ petition challenging the seizure of 96 multi-function devices by customs authorities. The court conditionally released the goods upon payment of enhanced duty within specified timelines, with the petitioner also required to provide a 10% bank guarantee and maintain transaction records. Importantly, the court clarified that customs authorities retain full rights to proceed with adjudication proceedings independently. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts