M/s Mega City Constructions (Regd. No. 2261 of vs The State of Telangana Advocate - GP FOR STAMPS AND REGISTRATION — WP/17712/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: 16th June 2026.

Next hearing 16-Jun-2026

CNR: HBHC010339622026

Filing Number

WP/24808/2026

Filing Date

06-May-2026

Registration No

WP/17712/2026

Registration Date

10-Jun-2026

Judge

Pulla Karthik

Coram

Pulla Karthik

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

WP ( 28 )

Sub-Category

TO RECEIVE AND REGISTER THE DOC ( 6 )

Judicial Branch

WRIT Section

Last updated 13-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M/s Mega City Constructions (Regd. No. 2261 of

  2. 2.NanaValla Dasharatha Reddy

  3. 3.Shaik Musthafa

  4. 4.Bobbili Bharathi

  5. 5.Bobbili Suma Reddy

  6. 6.Bobbili Sai Teja Reddy

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of Telangana Advocate - GP FOR STAMPS AND REGISTRATION

  2. 2.Special Secretary to Government

  3. 3.Chief Commissioner Land Administration

  4. 4.Commissioner and Inspector General

  5. 5.District Collector

  6. 6.District Registrar

  7. 7.Tahsildar

Case History

  1. 16-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 16-Jun-2026

    Admission (Stamps And Registration )

    Pulla Karthik

  3. 11-Jun-2026

    Pulla KarthikView PDF

    In WP.NO.17712 of 2026, the High Court for the State of Telangana adjourned the case on 11.06.2026 and posted it for 18.06.2026 on the top of the Daily List at the request of the petitioner's counsel. No substantive order on merits was passed; the matter remains pending for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 11-Jun-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 06-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/17712/2026

casestatus.in Summary

In WP.NO.17712 of 2026, the High Court for the State of Telangana adjourned the case on 11.06.2026 and posted it for 18.06.2026 on the top of the Daily List at the request of the petitioner's counsel. No substantive order on merits was passed; the matter remains pending for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case